FISKDALE, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: MARK LANGLOIS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARK LANGLOIS in 544 MAIN ST, FISKDALE, MA 01518 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 339045601.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARK LANGLOIS
- Site address
- 544 MAIN ST
- City
- FISKDALE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01518
- Mailing
- 35 BENEFIT ST, SOUTHBRIDGE, MA 01550
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.62 D01 I
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA): (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead off the front of the building, and the employer had not made an initial determination in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.62 D02 V A
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f): (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.62 D02 V B
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g): (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided appropriate personal protective clothing in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V C
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2): (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided a change area in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V D
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(D): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5): (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided hand washing facilities in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V E
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with biological monitoring in accordance with 1926.62(j)(1)(i), to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels: (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided biological monitoring in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.62 D02 V F
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication: (a) Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA: On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided hazard communication training in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339045601.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.