Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARK LANGLOIS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARK LANGLOIS in 544 MAIN ST, FISKDALE, MA 01518 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 339045601.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mark Langlois for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mark Langlois is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARK LANGLOIS
Site address
544 MAIN ST
City
FISKDALE
State
MA
ZIP
01518
Mailing
35 BENEFIT ST, SOUTHBRIDGE, MA 01550
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,800 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead off the front of the building, and the employer had not made an initial determination in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.62 D02 V A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(A): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(f):    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided appropriate respiratory protection in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.62 D02 V B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g):    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided appropriate personal protective clothing in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(C): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with change areas in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(2):    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided a change area in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(D): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with hand washing facilities in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(i)(5):    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided hand washing facilities in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V E

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(E): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with biological monitoring in accordance with 1926.62(j)(1)(i), to consist of blood sampling and analysis for lead and zinc protoporphyrin levels:    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided biological monitoring in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.62 D02 V F

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(F): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide to employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with training as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(l)(1)(i) regarding 29 CFR 1926.59, Hazard Communication:    (a)  Worksite located at 544 Main St, Fiskdale MA:  On or about 5/6/13, employees were scraping paint containing 13% lead from the front of the house, and the employer had not provided hazard communication training in accordance with this subpart.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339045601.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.