Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,195,903Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-18 Last loaded 2026-08-21

OSHA Inspection: ST. LOREN CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ST. LOREN CONSTRUCTION CORP. in 127 N. HIGHLAND AVE., OSSINING, NY 10562 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339047227.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ST. Loren Construction Corp. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ST. Loren Construction Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
127 N. HIGHLAND AVE.
City
OSSINING
State
NY
ZIP
10562
Mailing
1829 JEROME AVE., BRONX, NY 10463
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jul 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,200 · Current $120 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.    location: entire site  on or about: 5/3/13    a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not protected from falling up to 30 feet. The employees were not provided with any fall protection training.     location: entire site  on or about: 5/3/13    b) Employees, engaged in residential roofing, were not protected from falling up to 30 feet. The employees were not provided with adequate fall protection training.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $120
  • · C (S) $2200
  • · Z (S) $2200

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 4 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $80 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support:      location: between ground and lower roof  on or about: 5/3/13    a) Employees were using a 28 ft. Louisville ladder to access the lower roof. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the landing.    location: between ground and lower roof  on or about: 5/6/13    b) Employees were using a 28 ft. Louisville ladder to access the lower roof. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the landing.    location: between lower roof and upper roof  on or about: 5/3/13    c) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the upper roof. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the landing.      location: between lower roof and upper roof  on or about: 5/6/13    d) Employees were using a portable metal extension ladder to access the upper roof. The ladder did not extend 3 ft. above the landing.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $80
  • · C (S) $1320
  • · Z (S) $1320

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $80 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were not used only on stable and level surfaces unless secured to prevent accidental displacement:      location: between lower roof and upper roof  on or about: 5/6/13    a) Employees were using a ladder to access the upper roof. The ladder was not stable, level or secured.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $80
  • · C (S) $1320
  • · Z (S) $1320

1926.1053 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $80 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear.      location: between lower roof and upper roof  on or about: 5/6/13    a) Employees were using a ladder to access the upper roof. The area around the base of the ladder was covered with roofing debris.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $80
  • · C (S) $1320
  • · Z (S) $1320

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jul 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,320 · Current $80 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:      location: entire site  on or about: 5/3/12    a) Employees were using extension ladders while engaged in residential roofing. The employees were not provided with ladder safety training.      location: entire site  on or about: 5/3/12    b) Employees were using extension ladders while engaged in residential roofing. The employees were not provided with adequate ladder safety training.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $80
  • · C (S) $1320
  • · Z (S) $1320

1926.501 B13

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $15,400 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502:    Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    location: roof  on or about: 5/3/13    a) Employees engaged in residential roofing, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of up to 30 feet.        The employer, St. Loren Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314978875, citation number 1, item number 5 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/24/12 , with respect to a workplace located at 3825-3827 3rd Ave, Bronx, NY, 10456
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W) $800
  • · C (W) $15400
  • · Z (W) $15400

1926.21 B02

Repeat Gravity 5 6 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jul 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $490 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    location: entire site  on or about: 5/3/13    a) Employees, engaged in residential roofing work, were exposed to several hazards, including electrical hazards. The employees were not provided with safety training.      The employer, St. Loren Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314978875, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/24/12 , with respect to a workplace located at 3825-3827 3rd Ave, Bronx, NY, 10456.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $490
  • · C (R) $4400
  • · Z (R) $4400

1926.404 B01 I

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Abate by
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,400 · Current $490 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): General. The employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. These requirements are in addition to any other requirements for equipment grounding conductors:    location: entire site  on or about: 5/6/13    a) Employees were using electrical equipment, including saws and a compressor, while replaing a residential roof. The employees were not provided with GFCI protection or an assured equipment grounding conductor program.    The employer, St. Loren Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314978875, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/24/12 , with respect to a workplace located at 3825-3827 3rd Ave, Bronx, NY, 10456.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $490
  • · C (R) $4400
  • · Z (R) $4400

1926.404 F06

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,640 · Current $180 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): Grounding path. The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    location: entire site  on or about: 5/6/13    a) Employees were using electrical equipment including, but not limited to saws and a compressor, while engaged in residential roofing. An extension cord, with the grounding pin removed, was plugged into a two prong outlet.       The employer, St. Loren Construction Corp. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 314978875, citation number 1, item number 3 and was affirmed as a final order on 2/24/12 , with respect to a workplace located at 3825-3827 3rd Ave, Bronx, NY, 10456.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (R) $180
  • · C (R) $2640
  • · Z (R) $2640

View ST. Loren Construction Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339047227.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.