Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RICHADALE MANAGEMENT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICHADALE MANAGEMENT, INC. in 3002 PADDOCK ROAD, OMAHA, NE 68124 (NAICS 531311). OSHA activity number 339052458.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Richadale Management, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Richadale Management, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3002 PADDOCK ROAD
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68124
Mailing
10040 REGENCY CIRCLE STE 200, OMAHA, NE 68114
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531311
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:    At Latvian Village Apartment Complex: The employer failed to provide training to employees performing work that was outside of the normal scope of their job assignment. On or about April 30, 2013 an employee of Latvian Village Apartments a complex owned by Richdale Management, Inc. was told to dig a trench. The employee had not been trained on the recognition, avoidance and regulations applicable to the work he was told to perform.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2050
  • · Z (S) $5000

1926.651 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(b)(1): The estimated location of underground utility installations, such as sewer, telephone, fuel, electric, water lines, or any other underground installations that reasonably may be expected to be encountered during excavation work, were not identified prior to opening an excavation:    At Latvian Village Apartments: The employer failed to ensure that the location of underground utilities were located prior to digging. The employer had a groundskeeping employee excavate soil around a water hydrant for the purposes of capping the line. While the employee was digging a fiber optic cable was struck.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $2000
  • · Z (S) $4000

1926.651 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were 4 feet (1.22m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62m) of lateral travel for employees:    At Latvian Village Apartment Complex: the employer failed to ensure that employees digging / working inside of an approximately 7 foot deep trench were provided with a ladder or other safe means of egress.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $5000

1926.651 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $3,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(1): An inspection of the excavations, the adjacent areas, and protective systems was not conducted by the competent person prior to the start of work and as needed throughout the shift:    At Latvian Village Apartment Complex: The employer failed to inspect the trench during and before work started inside of the trench. The employer did not classify soil to determine type in order to determine the type of protective system to use to protect employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3400
  • · Z (S) $4250

1926.652 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 16, 2013
Abate by
Sep 12, 2013
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.652(a)(1): Each employee in an excavation was not protected from cave-ins by an adequate protective system designed in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.652(c):    At Latvian Village Apartment Complex; The employer failed to ensure that an employee working inside of a trench was protected from a potential collapse by an adequate protective system such as but not limited to sloping or benching or a protective shield such as shoring or a trench boxes.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4000
  • · Z (S) $5000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339052458.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.