HONOLULU, HI ·
OSHA Inspection: BAKERY EXPRESS & CATERING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BAKERY EXPRESS & CATERING, INC. in 711 QUEEN ST., HONOLULU, HI 96813 (NAICS 311811). OSHA activity number 339052672.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BAKERY EXPRESS & CATERING, INC.
- Site address
- 711 QUEEN ST.
- City
- HONOLULU
- State
- HI
- ZIP
- 96813
- Mailing
- 1288 ALA MOANA BLVD. SUITE 116, HONOLULU, HI 96814
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311811
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
22 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: STOREROOM: The mezzanine level storage area was not protected from falls on all sides.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $2000
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: FACILITY: Exit routes were cluttered with supplies and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: FACILITY: Exit routes were not marked with signs indicating direction of travel to exit discharge.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.37 B06
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(6): Each exit sign was not illuminated to a surface value of at least five foot-candles (54 lux) by a reliable light source and be distinctive in color: FACILITY: The backlight for the exit sign on the rear door was inoperative.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energy, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: FACILITY: The employer did not establish an energy control program for employees engaged in the cleaning, servicing and maintenance of the bakery machines.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(4): Portable fire extinguishers were not maintained in a fully charged and operable condition: FACILITY: Two fire extinguishers, mounted on the walls for employee use, were not fully charged.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.157 E03
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check: FACILITY: The fire extinguishers in the establishment were not inspected annually.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: FACILITY: The employer did not train employees, expected to fight incipient stage fires, in the use of fire extinguishers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: BAKING AREA: Two vertical mixers, used by the employees to mix dough and other baking ingredients, were not provided with mixing bowl guards
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2400
1910.263 G02
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.263(g)(2): Hand fed moulder(s) were not provided with either a belt-device or a hopper that extended high enough so that the hands of the operator could not get into the feed rolls: BAKING AREA: The bread molder, used by the employees to shape dough, was not equipped with a belt-device or hopper.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.304 F01 IV
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel: STOREROOM: The circuit breaker panels were inaccessible to employees as the workspace around the electric breaker panels was used for storage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap: BAKING AREA: The power cord for the small unguarded vertical mixer, against the front wall, was spliced in the middle.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: FOOD PREPARATION AREA: The power cable for the electric bread slicer was pulled from the cord end.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: FACILITY: The employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $800
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use: FACILITY: The employer did not maintain material safety data sheets for the hazardous chemicals in use on site.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: FACILITY: Employees were not provided with effective training on the hazardous chemicals used in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: KITCHEN AREA: a) The Relocatable Power Taps (RPT), used by the employer to power cooking equipment, were not used according to their listing and labeling instructions. b) The four inch wall mount box, mounted on the PVC conduit stub, was not used according to it's listing and labeling.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1000
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: BAKING AREA: Openings in the four-inch steel wall mount box, installed on the PVC conduit stub, were not effectively closed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasions: a) Conductors hanging from the PVC conduit, which was pulled from its coupling, were exposed to abrasion. b) The PVC conduit connector, entering the 4" stub mounted receptacle box, was not secured to the box. The conductors passing through the box opening were exposed to abrasion. c) The power cable connector for the dough moulding/baller was not secured to its enclosure. The conductors hanging through the box opening were exposed to abrasion. d) The power cable for the dough balling machine was not protected from abrasion where it entered the splice enclosure. e) The motor control power cable connector for the dough moulding/baller was not secured to its enclosure. The conductors hanging through the box opening were exposed to abrasion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1600
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy: CHOCOLATE ROOM: The wall receptacle, in the chocolate room, did not have a faceplate.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.4 A
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.4(a): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent. FACILITY: On or about May 7, 2013, the employer did not record the following workplace injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2012. The employer did not maintain any OSHA recordkeeping logs for the previous 5 years. An employee eye was scratched by a knife hanging over the edge of the counter when she bent down to pick up something she dropped. Abatement Certification and Documentation is required
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $400
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: FACILITY: The employer did not perform a PPE assessment for the work place.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311811)
More inspections in HI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339052672.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.