EDMOND, OK ·
OSHA Inspection: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. in 6701 VOUCHER DRIVE, EDMOND, OK 73034 (NAICS 325199). OSHA activity number 339058232.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 6701 VOUCHER DRIVE
- City
- EDMOND
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73034
- Mailing
- PO BOX 14726, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73113
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325199
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D04 III
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(iii): Electrical wiring and equipment located in inside storage rooms used for Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 F (37.8 C), was not approved under subpart S of this part for Class I, Division 2 Hazardous Locations; for Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint at or above 100 F (37.8 C) and Category 4 flammable liquids, was not approved for general use. Liquids storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not ensure approved electrical wiring was used in hazardous locations where Category 2 and 3 flammable liquids are stored exposing employees to the hazard of fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.106 E07 I B
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(7)(i)(b): Locations where flammable vapor-air mixtures may exist under normal operations shall be classified Class I, Division 1 according to the requirements of subpart S of this part. For those pieces of equipment installed in accordance with subparagraph (3)(v)(b) of this paragraph, the Division 1 area shall extend 5 feet in all directions from all points of vapor liberation. All areas within pits shall be classified Division 1 if any part of the pit is within a Division 1 or 2 classified area, unless the pit is provided with mechanical ventilation. Liquids processing area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not ensure approved electrical wiring was used in hazardous locations where Category 2 and 3 flammable liquids are processed exposing employees to the hazard of fire and explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 D
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d): The employer did not complete a compilation of written process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process: Liquid processing and storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not provide written process safety information for operations involving formaldehyde, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The employer did not perform an initial process hazard analysis (hazard evaluation) on processes covered by 29 CFR 1910.119: Liquid processing and storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not provide an initial process hazard analysis on operations involving formaldehyde, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 F01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process: Liquid processing and storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures to cover operations involving formaldehyde, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment: Liquid processing and storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not provide written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment being used in operations involving formaldehyde, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.120 Q01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan to handle anticipated emergencies prior to commencement of emergency response operations: Entire facility: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement an emergency response plan prior to requiring employees to respond to spills of hazardous substances, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.120 Q06
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6): The employer did not provide training in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(i) through (q)(6)(v) for employees who participated in or were expected to participate in emergency response: Entire facility: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not provide training to employees who were expected to participate in emergency response, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 F02
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(f)(2): The storage and handling of liquefied petroleum gas fuel shall be in accordance with NFPA Storage and Handling of Liquefied Petroleum Gases (NFPA No. 58-1969), which is incorporated by reference as specified in Sec. 1910.6: Liquid storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not ensure that liquefied petroleum gas was stored in accordance with NFPA 58-1969 exposing employees to the hazards of struck-by and/or burn and explosion.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.1048 D02
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(2): Employees who may have been exposed at or above the action level or STEL were not identified, and the exposure was not accurately determined for each identified employee: Liquid processing and storage area: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not accurately determine each employees exposure to formaldehyde, exposing employees to the hazard of chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in the work area shall be provided to employees at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area: Entire facility: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not provide effective information and training to employees at the time of their initial assignment, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1700
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator: Liquid and dry processing areas: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not ensure that an employee who voluntarily wears a tight-fitting respirator was medically able to use such respirator, exposing employees to the hazards associated with chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not prohibit a tight-fitting facepiece to be worn by employees who had facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face: Liquid and dry processing areas: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not ensure employees wearing tight fitting respirators did not have facial hair that interferes with the sealing surface of the respirator, exposing employees to the hazard of chemical exposure.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable Fire Extinguishers were not mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: Liquid storage and dry mixing areas: On or about May 8, 2013, the employer did not ensure clear access to fire extinguishers, exposing employees to the hazard of fires. a) Access to a fire extinguisher on the wall outside the entrance from the office into the dry mixing room was blocked by a ladder and cardboard. During the inspection, the employer moved the items blocking the access. b) Access to a fire extinguisher in the liquid storage area was blocked by a bucket and boxes of old equipment awaiting disposal.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325199)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339058232.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.