Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARMANDO CHAVEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMANDO CHAVEZ in 958 POPPY HILL DRIVE, BLACKLICK, OH 43004 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339060584.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Armando Chavez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Armando Chavez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARMANDO CHAVEZ
Site address
958 POPPY HILL DRIVE
City
BLACKLICK
State
OH
ZIP
43004
Mailing
384 LAWRENCE DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.28 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $476 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.28(a): The employer is responsible for requiring the wearing of appropriate personal protective equipment in all operations where there is an exposure to hazardous conditions or where this part indicates the need for using such equipment to reduce the hazards to the employees.    a. On the roof of the jobsite where an employee was using an air actuated nail gun to attach roofing material, the employee's eyes were not protected by safety glasses, thereby being exposed to a struck-by hazard.    b. On the ground below where employees were working on the roof, employees heads were not protected from falling objects by hard hats, thereby being exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $476
  • · Z (S) $1360

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a. On the roof of the house where employees were installing a new roof, the employees were not connected to a personal fall protection system, thereby exposing employees to a 10 foot, 10 inch fall hazard.    b. On the roof of the house where employees were installing a new roof, employees were using non-safety rated sport style climbing belts and rope grabs as a fall protection measure, thereby exposing employees to a 10 foot, 10 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $714
  • · Z (S) $2040

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 29, 2013
Abate by
Jun 18, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $357 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.    a. On the north side of the garage where employees accessed the roof by ladder, the ladder did not extend at least three feet beyond the edge of the roof, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard.    b. On the north side of the house at the porch, the ladder did not extend at least three feet beyond the edge of the roof, thereby exposing employees to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $357
  • · Z (S) $1020

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339060584.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.