PEORIA, IL —
OSHA Inspection: CMG SIDING, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CMG SIDING, INC. in 1700 WEST CONEFLOWER DRIVE, PEORIA, IL 61615 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339068843.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CMG SIDING, INC.
- Site address
- 1700 WEST CONEFLOWER DRIVE
- City
- PEORIA
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61615
- Mailing
- PO BOX 84518, LEXINGTON, SC 29073
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,760 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Prior to allowing employees to use the rough terrain forklift, the employer did not ensure that each operator had completed training, that included all of the truck and workplace related topics listed in the standard and completed an evaluation of the operators performance through practical exercise.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1760
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: The employer did not evaluate of the performance of each trained and certified powered industrial truck operator at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer shall certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l). The certification shall include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation. The employer did not document the required certification for each operator, which includes: the operators name, date of the training, date of the evaluation and/or the name of the person conducting the evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1926.21(b)(2): The employer shall instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the eye when using a pneumatic nail gun, and the employer had not provided instruction of unsafe conditions found at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1540
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Employees engaged in carpentry work were exposed to struck by hazards in the eye when using a pneumatic nail gun because eye protection was not used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A02
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being worn by the employees did not meet the requirements specified in American National Standards Institute, Z 87.1-1968, Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection: An employee using a circular saw was exposed to struck by hazards in the eye because the glasses the employee wore did not meet the requirements of Z 87.1-1968.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,080 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: Employees installing fascia and windows from a scaffold platform, which was supported by a rough terrain forklift were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 25ft because the guardrail on the platform did not meet the requirements of a standard rail in that it was 48 inches high and did not have midrails on all sides.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3080
1926.454 B
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who is involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operation, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question: Employees were working from a scaffold platform installing windows and the employer had not provided training to the employees on the nature of scaffold hazard, correct procedures for operating the scaffold, the design criteria and the intended use of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,200 · Current $1,540 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Employees engaged in carpentry work were exposed to fall hazards greater than 25ft., and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1540
- — Z (S) $2200
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee: The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,400 · Current $3,080 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Employees engaged in carpentry work were exposed to fall hazards greater than 25 ft., and the employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment. CMG Siding, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.20(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 605298, citation number 1, item number 1B and was affirmed as a final order on November 12, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 1600 Coneflower Drive, Peoria, IL 61615.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $3080
- — Z (R) $4400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 31, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,160 · Current $4,312 Reduced
General-duty citation text
1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. Employees engaged in carpentry work were exposed to fall hazards greater than 25ft., because fall protection was not being used. CMG Siding, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 605298, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on November 12, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 1600 Coneflower Drive, Peoria, IL 61615.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $4312
- — Z (R) $6160
More inspections at CMG Siding, INC.
View CMG Siding, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339068843.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.