YUKON, OK —
OSHA Inspection: COOK'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of COOK'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 335 S. MUSTANG RD., YUKON, OK 73085 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 339077331.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- COOK'S CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 335 S. MUSTANG RD.
- City
- YUKON
- State
- OK
- ZIP
- 73085
- Mailing
- 10410 E. I240, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73150
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): At the worksite: On or about May 21, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed an employee to operate a rough terrain type forklift without providing the required training and evaluation for powered industrial trucks. Employees were exposed to fall from heights, caught in between and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person and were not constructed and loaded in accordance with that design: At the job site, on or about May 21, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the employer allowed employees to use an elevated work platform supported by a rough terrain forklift that was not designed by a qualified person. Employees were exposed to fall from heights hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 F15
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders were used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees: At the worksite: On or about May 21 2013 the employer allowed the use of a step ladder to reach a higher level while working from an elevated work platform supported by a rough terrain forklift. Employee was exposed to fall from heights hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.760 A
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.760(a): Each employee engaged in a steel erection activity who is on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge more than 15 feet (4.6 m) above a lower level were not protected from fall hazards by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, positioning device systems or fall restraint systems: At the worksite: On or about May 21, 2013, an employee was allowed to conduct steel erection activity at heights greater than 15 feet without a means of fall protection. The employee was exposed to fall from heights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 7, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: At the worksite: On or about May 21 2013, the employer did not require the use of head protection while employees were working in an area with overhead hazards present. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from falling and flying objects.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in OK
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339077331.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.