PLYMOUTH, MA —
OSHA Inspection: MMG CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MMG CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED in 275 COURT STREET, PLYMOUTH, MA 02360 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339078768.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MMG CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 275 COURT STREET
- City
- PLYMOUTH
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02360
- Mailing
- 60 S BOW STREET, MILFORD, MA 01757
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: Jobsite: Site. All workers had not been adequately instructed in hazard recognition, abatement, or the Standards applicable to the work environment such as ladder use, fall protection, and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): Jobsite: Site. Employees were exposed to falls of up to 22 feet from the roof to the ground where they had not been properly instructed to recognize fall hazards and how to avoid the unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to the work environment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Jobsite: Ground. The owner/Foreman was exposed to head injuries while cleaning up debris on the ground below an active roofing operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Jobsite: Roof. None of the workers using the the pneumatic nail guns while fastening shingles onto the roof were wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: Jobsite: Roof. Workers were exposed to falls of up to approximately 22 feet to the ground below while performing roofing work where fall protection had not been provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 24, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: Roof access. Workers were exposed to falls of approximately 22 feet to the ground below where the siderails of the aluminum extension ladder, used to access the roof, did not extend 3 feet above the eave.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections at MMG Construction, Incorporated
View MMG Construction, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339078768.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.