SPRINGBORO, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: RICKY L. DIRR
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RICKY L. DIRR in 125 PARK LANE, SPRINGBORO, OH 45066 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339079139.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICKY L. DIRR
- Site address
- 125 PARK LANE
- City
- SPRINGBORO
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45066
- Mailing
- 250 N. RILEY BLVD., FRANKLIN, OH 45005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Workers were observed engaged in commercial construction activities re-roofing an existing structure. (Library) Workers were exposed to potential fall hazards 12.3 and 18.6 foot fall hazards and a job-site inspection by a competent person was not conducted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $1800
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,520 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: Workers were observed engaged in commercial construction activities re-roofing an existing structure. (Library) Workers were exposed to potential fall hazards 12.3 and 18.6 foot fall hazards in that a fall protection system was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $2520
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Workers were observed engaged in commercial construction activities re-roofing an existing structure. (Library) Workers were exposed to potential fall hazards 12.3 and 18.6 foot fall hazards and the workers were not properly trained in fall protection criteria.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $1800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339079139.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.