Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: 2W PAINTING COMPANY

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of 2W PAINTING COMPANY in 360 NORTH MAIN STREET, RANDOLPH, MA 02368 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 339080210.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 2W Painting Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 2W Painting Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
2W PAINTING COMPANY
Site address
360 NORTH MAIN STREET
City
RANDOLPH
State
MA
ZIP
02368
Mailing
75 BELMONT STREET, EVERETT, MA 02149
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Dec 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at least  included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)(a)      Location:  Worksite    The employees handle at least 2 hazardous chemicals (Diedrich Technologies Caustic Paint Remover, Smart Strip Advanced Paint Remover), and the employer has not developed a written Hazard Communication Program which at least outlinies the steps that the employer will take to ensure that:    a) Labels on incoming containers will be maintained  b) Material Safety Data Sheets will be avilable to employees at all times  3) Employees will be provided training on the hazards of the chemicals and the means of protecting themselves
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided or used:    Location; Worksite    Employees were exposed to corrosive chemicals that could severely damage the skin and eyes and were not provided with the necessary protection, including proper gloves (butyl or neoprene), safety glasses, and aprons, as per the MSDSs.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.    Location:  Worksite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet while standing on a pump jack scaffold without any guardrails at the ends of the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $800
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iii): When midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, solid panels, or equivalent structural members are used, they were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the scaffold platform.   Location:  Worksite   Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 13 feet while working on a pump jack scaffold without any midrail, screen, mesh, or intermediate member between the top edge of the guardrail system and the scaffold platform.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.    Location:  Worksite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet from a pump jack scaffold with supporting poles that were not secured to the bottom of the building by rigid triangular bracing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Aug 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  Location:  Worksite  The employer did not provide the employees with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer provided the employees with N95 respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339080210.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.