Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROCKFORD METAL POLISHING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROCKFORD METAL POLISHING COMPANY in 5700 INDUSTRIAL AVE, LOVES PARK, IL 61111 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339081846.

Watch Rockford Metal Polishing Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rockford Metal Polishing Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5700 INDUSTRIAL AVE
City
LOVES PARK
State
IL
ZIP
61111
Mailing
5700 INDUSTRIAL AVE, LOVES PARK, IL 61111
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.124 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2013
Abate by
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.124(g)(2):     Employees who worked with liquids that could burn, irritate, or otherwise harm their skin were not provided with an emergency shower and eye-wash station close to the dipping and coating operation:      On or about May 23, 2013 the employee operator of the vapor degreaser containing n-Propyl Bromide, which can be absorbed through the skin and cause skin irritation, was not provided with an emergency shower and eye-wash station.     Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2013
Abate by
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i):     When the employer had assessed the workplace hazard(s) and determined that hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select and/or use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee from the hazard(s) identified:     On or about May 23, 2013 the employee operator of the vapor degreaser containing n-Propyl Bromide, which can be absorbed through the skin and cause skin irritation, was using incorrect gloves to protect the hands against skin irritation and to block absorption.    Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2013
Abate by
Nov 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $840 Reduced

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1):     The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:     On or about May 23, 2013 the employee operator of the vapor degreaser containing n-Propyl Bromide, an eye irritant, was not wearing appropriate eye or face protection.     Abatement certification is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2013
Abate by
Dec 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i):     Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability:     On or about May 23, 2013 the employee operator of the vapor degreaser containing n-Propyl Bromide, a chemical with potential neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and reproductive and developmental toxicity through inhalation, was exposed to n-Propyl Bromide above Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs) while wearing the incorrect respirator type; the employee was wearing an N95 Particulate Respirator (filtering facepiece/dust mask) instead of a respirator such as a tight-fitting air purifying respirator with organic vapor cartridges.     Abatement documentation is required of this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1960
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances R290

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii):     The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:      On or about May 23, 2013 the employer did not evaluate the respiratory hazard posed to its employee operator of the vapor degreaser containing n-Propyl Bromide by including a reasonable estimate of exposure; n-Propyl Bromide is a chemical with potential neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and reproductive and developmental toxicity through inhalation.     There is no abatement certification or documentation required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339081846.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.