Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ABBADY INTERNATIONAL IMPORT & EXPORT

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of ABBADY INTERNATIONAL IMPORT & EXPORT in P.O. BOX 68, WIND GAP, PA 18091 (NAICS 488510). OSHA activity number 339085094.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Abbady International Import & Export for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Abbady International Import & Export is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
P.O. BOX 68
City
WIND GAP
State
PA
ZIP
18091
Mailing
510 MALE RD., WIND GAP, PA 18091
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488510
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Abate by
Nov 1, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  (a)  Throughout Facility - A hazard assessment was not conducted to identify workplace hazards and the related personal protective equipment necessary for employee protection, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.135 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.135(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee wear a protective helmet when working in areas where there is a potential for injury to the head from falling objects:  (a)  Throughout Facility - Employees working with suspended materials using a sling and other related lifting equipment and were exposed to head injuries were not wearing protective helmets, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,190 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  (a)  Throughout Facility - Employees disassembling construction vehicles, which contain multiple sources of stored energy, were not protected by an energy control program, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1190
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.157 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,020 · Current $714 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  (a)  Throughout Facility - Employees working with combustible and flammable gases and oils were not trained on the use of fire extinguishers, on or about 5/28/13.  Abatement Note:  Among other feasible means of abatement, the employer may provide training on the use of portable fire extinguishers or develop an evacution program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $714
  • · Z (S) $1020

1910.184 C09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Abate by
Oct 24, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(9): Employee(s) were not kept clear of load(s) suspended, or about to be lifted by sling(s):  (a)  Yard Area - Employees were working within the fall zone of a suspended excavator component as it was being lifted by an alloy steel chain sling, on or about 5/27/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4900
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.184 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(6): Slings were not securely attached to their loads:  (a)  Yard Area - Employees slinging excavator components were using a steel chain routed through a bearing race which displaced under load, on or about 5/27/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1): Alloy steel sling(s) did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:  (a)  Yard Area - Employees slinging excavator components were using a steel chain that was not marked with any indication of its capability or capacity, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.184 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(i): Thorough periodic inspections of alloy steel chain slings in use were not made on a regular basis:   (a)  Yard Area - A steel chain being used by employees to sling excavator components had not been inspected as required on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $952 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a)  Throughout Facility - A hazard communication program was not developed or implemented in the facility where employees were working with chemicals such as fuel oil and hydraulic fluid, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $952
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:   (a)  Throughout Facility - Employees were exposed to the hazard of 55 gallon drums containing used hydraulic fluid and other captured oils which were not labeled to identify their contents and with an appropriate hazard warning, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace:  (a)  Throughout Facility - The employer did not have material safety data sheets for each chemical that was being kept in the facility, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   (a)  Throughout Facility -  Chemical hazard communication training was not provided where employees were working with hazardous chemicals such as fuel oils and hydraulic fluids, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.304 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(a)(2): Grounded conductors were attached to terminals or leads so as to reverse designated polarity:   (a) Garage Storage Room - An electrical outlet was incorrectly wired creating a condition of reverse polarity exposing employees to electrical hazards, on or about 5/28/13.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339085094.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.