Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ECOLOGICAL CONCEPTS INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ECOLOGICAL CONCEPTS INC. in 1955 PINE STREET, BURLINGTON, WI 53105 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 339085268.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ecological Concepts INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ecological Concepts INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1955 PINE STREET
City
BURLINGTON
State
WI
ZIP
53105
Mailing
1955 PINE STREET, BURLINGTON, WI 53105
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section.  (a) The employer had not developed, documented or utilized procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were conducting lockout/tagout. Employees were exposed to electrical and heat sources of energy on the extruder machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $3,430 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l)  (Construction Reference 1926.602):  (a) The employer did not ensure that each employee was provided training before operating the Komatsu forklift model # FG20S1-12.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):   (a) The employer could not provide a written certification that a hazard assessment was performed for the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Nov 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:   (a) The employer did not ensure that employees had basic advisory information on respirators prior to employees voluntarily using respirators while handling fiberglass.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 32 exposed
Issued
Sep 19, 2013
Abate by
Oct 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): 29 CFR 1919.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2) and (3) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were provided training on hazard communication where employee's use chemicals such as, but not limited to: SuperLite Light-Weight Reinforced Thermoplastic.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Ecological Concepts INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339085268.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.