ODESSA, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE REYES
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE REYES in 7607 DOONMORE ST., ODESSA, TX 79762 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339086456.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE REYES
- Site address
- 7607 DOONMORE ST.
- City
- ODESSA
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79762
- Mailing
- 9136 MT. OLYMPUS DR., EL PASO, TX 79924
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about May 21, 2013, the two-tier scaffold erected in front of the house and used by employee(s) did not have base plates and mudsills. Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than ten feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement: On or about May 21, 2013, the two-tier scaffold erected in front of the house and used by employee(s) did not have level footings that were sound or rigid. Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than ten feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02 II
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(ii): Unstable objects were used to support scaffolds or platform units: On or about May 21, 2013, the two-tier scaffold erected in front of the house had a brick broken in half supporting the scaffold. Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than ten feet. Employee(s) were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than ten feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E09 IV
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(9)(iv): Cross braces on tubular welded frame scaffolds were used as a means of access or egress. On or about May 21, 2013, the employee observed working off a 6:12 pitch roof used the scaffold located in front of the house as means of egress from the roof. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of greater than ten feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.501 B09 I
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(9)(i): Each employee performing overhand bricklaying and related work 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems: On or about May 21, 2013, one employee was observed working off a 6:12 pitch roof while plastering rock to the house exterior. The employee was not utilizing a fall protection system. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard of greater than six feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about May 21, 2013, the employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize those hazards. One employee was exposed to a fall hazard of greater than six feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 G01 I
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(1)(i): Flexible cords and cables were not suitable for conditions of use and location: On or about May 21, 2013, the employee using the cement cutter had its electrical power supplied by plugging three electrical extension cords together. The employer did not ensure that employee(s) followed manufacturer's instructions. The employees were exposed to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Jose Reyes
View Jose Reyes's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339086456.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.