Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: M & G TRUCKING AND TRANSPORTATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M & G TRUCKING AND TRANSPORTATION, INC. in 1 SAN ANTONIO WAY, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 339087165.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M & G Trucking and Transportation, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M & G Trucking and Transportation, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 SAN ANTONIO WAY
City
PAWTUCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02860
Mailing
1 SAN ANTONIO WAY, PAWTUCKET, RI 02860
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484121
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Oct 10, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,080 · Current $1,540 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): Training did not consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:     a) Establishment: On or about 5/30/2013, the employer had not assured that each powered industrial truck operator had received practical training and an evaluation of their performance in the workplace, prior to operating the two Komatsu and one Toyota powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1540
  • · Z (S) $3080

1910.178 P01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2013
Abate by
Aug 28, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):   (a) Establishment: On or about 5/30/2013, the #1 Toyota powered industrial truck was being operated by employees when the driver's seat was missing large parts of the bottom of the seat, giving the driver an unstable surface to sit upon.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339087165.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.