PAGO PAGO, AS —
OSHA Inspection: PARAMOUNT BUILDERS, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of PARAMOUNT BUILDERS, INC. in SAMOA TUNA PROCESSOR WAREHOUSE, ATU'U, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339088148.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARAMOUNT BUILDERS, INC.
- Site address
- SAMOA TUNA PROCESSOR WAREHOUSE, ATU'U
- City
- PAGO PAGO
- State
- AS
- ZIP
- 96799
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 2070, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- Employees
- 130
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,970 · Current $2,673 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): The employer did not determine if the voluntary use of a respirator did not in itself create a hazard: (Construction Reference 1926.103): The employer does not ensure that the voluntary use of a respirator does not in itself create a hazard. This violation was observed on June 7, 2013; where the employer provided and the employees used filtering face piece respirators on a voluntary basis for chipping concrete and painting. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that respirator use is evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2673
- — Z (S) $2970
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: (Construction Reference 1926.103). The employer does not provide the basic advisory information on respirators in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators voluntarily. This violation was discovered on June 7, 2013 where the employer allowed employees to use filtering face piece respirators without providing the basic advisory information on the respirators. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure advisory information on respirators is provided to employees who wear respirators voluntarily.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.50 C
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,970 · Current $2,673 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.50(c): A person who has a valid certificate in first-aid training was not available at the worksite to render first-aid: The employer does not ensure at least one person on worksites that are not reasonably accessible to medical facilities has a valid certificate in first-aid training. This violation occurred on May 27, 2013 and times thereafter at the Samoa Tuna Processor can plant warehouse located 30 minutes from the nearest hospital; where no one with a valid certificate in first-aid training was available to render treatment in the event of an injury at the worksite. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that at least one person on worksites away from medical facilities has training and a valid certificate in first-aid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2673
- — Z (S) $2970
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,237 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Crossbraces were used as a means of access. The employer does not ensure that scaffold platforms more than 2 feet above or below a point of access have portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers, stairway-type ladders, ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface for employee access. This violation occurred on June 4, 2013 and times prior thereto where the employees used the cross-braces and end-rails to access scaffold platforms. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure proper access to scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6237
- — Z (S) $6930
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,237 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: The employer does not ensure that each employee exposed to fall hazards is trained by a competent person qualified in the subjects required by 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii). This violation occurred on May 27, 2013 and times prior thereto at the Samoa Tuna Processor can plant warehouse; where workers walking/working the beams and the purlins of the roof were not provided with training to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each employee exposed to fall hazards is trained by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6237
- — Z (S) $6930
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $6,930 · Current $6,237 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided: The employer does not ensure that stairways or ladders are provided when there is a break in elevation of 19 inches or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided. This violation occurred on June 4, 2013 and times prior thereto; where the employees accessed the beams and the purlins of the roof by scaling the side walls to access the roof. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure proper personnel points of access where there is a break in elevation of 19 inches or more.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6237
- — Z (S) $6930
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: The employer does not ensure that portable ladders side rails extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface which the ladder is used to gain access. This violation occurred on June 4, 2013 and times prior thereto; where the employees accessed the beams and the purlins of the roof by using a short ladder and then scaling the side walls to access the roof. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure proper usage of portable ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $5,346 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired: The employer does not ensure that portable ladders with structural defects are either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies it as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and/or are not withdrawn from service until repaired. This violation occurred on June 4, 2013 and times prior thereto; where the employees had accessed the beams and the purlins of the roof by using a portable ladder with missing rungs. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that portable ladders are inspected and defective ladders withdrawn from service until repaired.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5346
- — Z (S) $5940
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $69,300 · Current $62,370 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. The employer does not ensure employees walking/working 6 feet or more above a lower level are protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest system. This violation occurred on May 27, 2013 and times prior thereto at the Samoa Tuna Processor can plant warehouse roof where; where workers painting the beams and purlins were not protected at all times from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees working at elevations above 6 feet are protected from fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $62370
- — Z (W) $69300
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $5,940 · Current $5,346 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) The employer does not maintain copies of material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace. This violation was discovered on June 4, 2013, at the Can Plant Warehouse; where the employer did not maintain copies of all material safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to Devoe Paint, white galvanized primer, Alkyd metal primer and Oatey PVC cleaner. Paramount Builders Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313672446, citation number 1, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on December 24, 2009 with respect to a workplace located at the New Aircraft Hangar, Tafuna Airport, American Samoa. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure copies of material safety data sheets for all hazardous chemicals are maintained in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $5346
- — Z (R) $5940
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Nov 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) The employer does not provide information and training to employees on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazardous chemical is introduced into the work area. This violation was discovered on June 4, 2013, at the Can Plant Warehouse; where material safety data sheets were not available and employees were not trained on new hazardous chemicals in use to include, but not limited to Devoe Paint, white galvanized primer, Alkyd metal primer and Oatey PVC cleaner. Paramount Builders Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(h), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 313672446, citation number 1, item number 1c and was affirmed as a final order on December 24, 2009 with respect to a workplace located at the New Aircraft Hangar, Tafuna Airport, American Samoa. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure employees are trained on all hazardous chemicals used in their work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
More inspections at Paramount Builders, INC.
View Paramount Builders, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in AS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339088148.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.