SAINT LOUIS, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: ABBEY CARE
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ABBEY CARE in 5303 BERMUDA RD., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63121 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 339090581.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ABBEY CARE
- Site address
- 5303 BERMUDA RD.
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63121
- Mailing
- 5303 BERMUDA RD., SAINT LOUIS, MO 63121
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 70
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Personal protective equipment was not used and/or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: a/ Soiled utility room 300 Hall, Soiled utility room 100 Hall, and Soiled utility room Special Care Unit; personal protective equipment including but not limited to eye protection and gloves were not present and used by CNAs and nurse aides who rinsed out soiled linen in the hopper. b/ Kitchen, eye protection was not present and used by employee(s) who used corrosive chemicals to clean the oven. c/ Laundry, eye protection was not present and used by employee(s) who changed out corrosive chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1249.5
- · Z (S) $1785
1910.1030 G02 VII J
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(vii)(J) The bloodborne pathogens training program did not contain information on the appropriate actions to take or persons to contact in an emergency involving blood or other potentially infectious materials: The blood borne pathogens training program did not provide refresher training on the blood spill clean-up procedure to be used at the facility.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment was isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: For the maintenance employee who performed servicing or maintenance on equipment including but not limited to replacing the belt on Laundry washer #1, a lockout tag out program had not been implemented including but not limited to: a) the use of singular locks and keys and devices b) coordination with outside contractors d) periodic inspections e) lockout tag out training
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1249.5
- · Z (S) $1785
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body was not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a/ In the kitchen for employees who used corrosive chemicals including but not limited to Oven and Grille Cleaner (potassium hydroxide), HWD (Hard Water Machine Dish Detergent - potassium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite), and Blast Heavy Duty Cleaner (potassium hydroxide), an approved eye wash was not available for immediate emergency use. b/ In the laundry for employees who used corrosive chemicals including but not limited to 33- Blitz and DeStainer (sodium hypochlorite), an approved eyewash was not available for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1249.5
- · Z (S) $1785
1904.8 A
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $595 · Current $417 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.8(a) Work-related needle stick injuries or cuts from sharp objects contaminated with another person's blood or potentially infectious material were not entered on the OSHA 300 Log as a privacy case: 2011 OSHA 300 Log (Case #3) , a needle stick injury was recorded with the employee's name and not entered as a privacy case.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $416.5
- · Z (O) $595
1910.1030 H05 I
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(5)(i): The employer did not establish and maintain a sharps injury log for the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps: At the establishment, the needle stick injury recorded on the 2011 OSHA 300 Log (Case #3) , was not recorded on the employer's sharps injury log.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339090581.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.