Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: W - TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of W - TECHNOLOGY, INC. in 19515 OIL CENTER BOULEVARD, HOUSTON, TX 77073 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339092595.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch W - Technology, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for W - Technology, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19515 OIL CENTER BOULEVARD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77073
Mailing
19515 OIL CENTER BOULEVARD, HOUSTON, TX 77073
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
60
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 19 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.   The employer does not guard the rotating parts of machines whose operation exposes employees to injury.   a. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Daewoo Puma 10 HC w/ Mitsubishi Control (1996) CNC Lathe with Serial #: PH100732 without the interlock for the door guards.   b. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Daewoo Puma 12L-C w/ Funac Control (1996) CNC Lathe with Serial #: PL120704 without the interlock for the door guards.   c. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Lynx 220LM 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling CNC Lathe with Serial #: L220M0771 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.      d. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Lynx 220LM 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling CNC Lathe with Serial #: L220M0883 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   e. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Lynx 220LM 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling CNC Lathe with Serial #: ML0627-001173 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   f. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 240M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling (2010) CNC Lathe with Serial #: P24M5315 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.     g This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 240M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling (2010) CNC Lathe with Serial #: P24M5722 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.    h. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 2100M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling (2012) CNC Lathe with Serial #: ML0091-000408 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   i. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 2600M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling CNC Lathe with Serial #: ML0103-000395 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   j. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 2600M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling CNC Lathe with Serial #: ML0103-000372 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   k. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 2600M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling CNC Lathe with Serial #: ML0103-000385 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.      l. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 280M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling (2010) CNC Lathe with Serial #: P280M1740 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   m. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 300 Turning Center (2001) CNC Lathe with Serial #: PM251001 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   n. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan Puma 300M 3 Axis Turning Center w/ Live Tooling (2011) CNC Lathe with Serial #: ML0054-003586 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   o. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan DNM400 4 Axis Mill CNC Milling with Serial #: DNM4000711 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   p. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Doosan DNM400 4 Axis Mill CNC Milling with Serial #: MV0009-001212 with the interlock for the door guards disabled.   q. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Fadal VMC4020 Axis Mill (1995) CNC Milling with Serial #: 95085594 without the interlock for the door guards.   r. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Fadal VMC4020 Axis Mill (1995) CNC Milling with Serial #: 9701129 without the interlock for the door guards.   s. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, at the facility where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-by hazards when operating a Fadal VMC4020 Axis Mill (1995) CNC Milling with Serial #: 9709003 without the interlock for the door guards.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all machines that have exposed rotating parts are guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air, that was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i., was used for cleaning purposes without effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.  The employer does not ensure that compressed air used for cleaning is reduced to less than 30 psi. This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, when employees throughout the facility were exposed to struck-by hazards while blowing off equipment with compressed air that was set to a pressure of 130 psi.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all compressed air used by employees to blow off equipment is reduced to less than 30 psi.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.303 B01 VIII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(viii): Electric equipment was not free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. Safety of equipment was not determined using the following considerations: Other factors that contribute to the practical safeguarding of persons using or likely to come in contact with the equipment.  The employer does not ensure that the electrical equipment was free from hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.  This violation was observed on or about May 31, 2013, in the facility where employees were exposed to an electrical hazard from exposed live wiring used to power a conveyor.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that electrical equipment are free from hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2940
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 F05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 14, 2013
Abate by
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein.   The employer does not ensure that containers of hazardous chemicals in the work place are labeled with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings of the chemicals they contain. This violation occurred on or about May 31, 2013, when employees in the facility were transferring chemicals into spray bottles and storing them in their work area without labeling them with the identity and appropriate hazard warning of the chemical.  Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that all hazardous chemical containers, not intended for immediate use, are labeled with the identity and the appropriate hazard warning of the chemical they contain.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339092595.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.