Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SONOCO PROTECTIVE SOLUTIONS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SONOCO PROTECTIVE SOLUTIONS in 1830 ROCKDALE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., CONYERS, GA 30012 (NAICS 326140). OSHA activity number 339092678.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sonoco Protective Solutions — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sonoco Protective Solutions is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1830 ROCKDALE INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
City
CONYERS
State
GA
ZIP
30012
Mailing
1830 ROCKDALE INDUSTRIAL BLVD., CONYERS, GA 30012
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326140
Employees
70
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2013
Abate by
Oct 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while performing work around damaged racks.  On or about May 30, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while performing work around damaged racks.  The employer failed to regularly inspect rack systems for damage and replace or repair damaged racks.  The following racks were damaged: a.  Support post in mold storage area  in breezeway between production and skid warehouse b.  Support post in the skid warehouse in the product racks at location 25  c.  Support post in the skid warehouse in the product racks at location FPP7B  AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHOD TO CORRECT THESE HAZARDS IS: 1. The employer shall follow American National Standard Institute (ANSI) MH16.1:2008, Specification for the Design, Testing, and Utilization of Industrial Storage Racks, Section 1.4.1(2), which states, "The owner shall maintain the structural integrity of the installed rack system by assuring proper operational housekeeping and maintenance procedures 2. Regularly inspect for damage. If damage is found, immediately unload the affected area and replace or repair any damaged columns, beams, or other structural components.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $7000

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2013
Abate by
Oct 7, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,250 · Current $1,350 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about May 29, 2013, employees were exposed to chemical hazards when the employer did not provide temporary employees information on the location of the program and MSDS, or employee training.  Employees were exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, polystyrene, salt water, and thickening agents (polar pack).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1350
  • — Z (S) $2250

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2013
Abate by
Oct 29, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  On or about May 30, 2013, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when the annual lockout/tagout review was two months overdue.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Sonoco Protective Solutions's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339092678.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.