ATTLEBORO, MA —
OSHA Inspection: CRAFT, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CRAFT, INC. in 1929 COUNTY STREET, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703 (NAICS 332510). OSHA activity number 339095028.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRAFT, INC.
- Site address
- 1929 COUNTY STREET
- City
- ATTLEBORO
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02703
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 3047, SOUTH ATTLEBORO, MA 02703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332510
- Employees
- 38
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $893 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: Signs were not posted in the Machine Room and Press Rooms A, B, and C to indicate the direction of travel to the nearest exit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $892.5
- — Z (S) $1785
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: 1) Tubbing Room - The installed eyewash was not adequate in that the water flow from the two nozzles was not even so that both eyes could be flushed simultaneously. 2) Press Room A - The installed eyewash was not working - there was no water flow when activated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,190 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: Evaluations were not conducted for employees who completed the last training class which was over five years ago.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1190
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.178 L05
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(5): Where an operator had previously received training in a topic specified in paragraph (l)(3) of this section, and such training was appropriate to the truck and working conditions encountered,the operator was not evaluated to determine that he was competent to operate the truck safely: Facility: The Employer did not evaluate forklift operators who were previously trained on similar equipment to ensure that they were competent to operate the forklifts safely.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,517 · Current $759 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: Tool Room: Employees were exposed to laceration hazards while working on the B&D bench grinder equipped with abrasive wheels where the tongue guard on the left wheel was approximately 7/8-inches from the wheel and the tongue guard on the right wheel was approximately 3/4-inches from the wheel.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $758.5
- — Z (S) $1517
1910.217 C02 I B
- Issued
- Jun 11, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.217(c)(2)(i)(b): Point of operation guard(s) on mechanical power press(es) did not conform to the maximum permissible opening(s) specified in Table O-10: Employees were exposed to amputation hazards while operating the following mechanical power presses where the discharge openings in the guards did not meet the requirements in Table O-10: 1) Press Room A - Perkins 35 ton with 1498 tooling: The opening was approximately 5-inches x 3.5-inches and the distance from the point of operation was approximately 8-inches; 2) Press Room B - V&O Press 3: The opening was approximately 5.25-inches x 5.5-inches and the distance from the point of operation was approximately 9-inches; 3) Press Room B - Minster B1-32, No. 19: The opening was approximately 8.25-inches x 5.5-inches and the distance from the point of operation was approximately 9-inches; 4) Press Room B - Unknown Press, No. 36: The opening was was approximately 3-inches x 10-inches to the left of the discharge feed, and approximately 6-inches x 4-inches above the discharge feed, and the distance from the point of operation was approximately 15-inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1487.5
- — Z (S) $2975
More inspections at Craft, INC.
View Craft, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332510)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339095028.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.