Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EASTERN SHORE NEUROLOGY CLINIC, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EASTERN SHORE NEUROLOGY CLINIC, INC. in 27535 US HWY 98, DAPHNE, AL 36526 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 339098501.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eastern Shore Neurology Clinic, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eastern Shore Neurology Clinic, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
27535 US HWY 98
City
DAPHNE
State
AL
ZIP
36526
Mailing
27535 US HWY 98, DAPHNE, AL 36526
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
621111
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1030 C01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i):   Each employer having an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure.  a)  On June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to bloodborne pathogen hazards by failing to ensure that a written Blood Borne Pathogen Plan to include an Exposure Control Plan was available and implemented to cover all clinic employees with exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(2)(i):  Each employer who has an employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section shall prepare an exposure determination.        a)  On June 3, 2013 and at times prior to; the employer exposed employees to bloodborne pathogen hazards by failing to evaluate exposure through an Employee Exposure Determination to cover all clinic employees with exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 D02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i):  Engineering and work practice controls shall be used to eliminate or minimize employee exposure. Where occupational exposure remains after institution of these controls, personal protective equipment shall also be used.   a)  On June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer exposed employee(s) to bloodborne pathogen hazards that could cause diseases by not providing and requiring that employees use safety engineered needles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 D02 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(vii): Contaminated needles and other contaminated sharps shall not be bent, recapped, or removed except as noted in paragraphs (d)(2)(vii)(A) and (d)(2)(vii)(B) below. Shearing or breaking of contaminated needles is prohibited.  a)  On June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer exposed employee(s) to bloodborne pathogen hazard that could cause diseases by allowing employees to remove contaminated needles from syringe after use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 D04 III A2III

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(iii): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not replaced routinely or were allowed to be overfilled.    a)  Examination room 1: On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior;  the employer exposed employee(s) to bloodborne pathogen hazards that could cause diseases by allowing contaminated sharps containers to be filled over the demarcated fill line.    b)  Examination room 3: On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior;  the employer exposed employee(s) to bloodborne pathogen hazards that could cause diseases by allowing contaminated sharps containers to be filled over the demarcated fill line.    c)  Examination room 5: On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior;  the employer exposed employee(s) to bloodborne pathogen hazards that could cause diseases by allowing contaminated sharps containers to be filled over the demarcated fill line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 F01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(1)(i): The employer did not make available the hepatitis B vaccine and vaccination series to all employees who have occupational exposure.  a)  On June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer exposed employee(s) to bloodborne pathogen hazards that could cause diseases by failing to make the Hepatitis B vaccine available to the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1030 G02 II A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A):  The employer did not ensure that training provided to employees with occupational exposure was conducted at the time initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure may take place:     a)  On or about June 3, 2013, and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to bloodborne pathogen hazards by failing to ensure that a written Blood Borne Pathogen Plan to include an Exposure Control Plan and initial training was available and implemented to cover all clinic employees with exposure to blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.1096 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(1): The employer did not make such surveys as necessary to evaluate the radiation hazards incident to the production, use, release, disposal or presence of radioactive materials or other sources of radiation under a specific set of conditions:   a)  Fluoro room: On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer failed to perform a radiation survey to determinate the amount of radiation to which employees are exposed to.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1096 D02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2): Appropriate personnel monitoring or equipment such as film badges, pocket chambers, pocket dosimeters of film rings were not supplied to or required to be used by employee(s) as described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(d)(2)(i),(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(2)(iii)  (a) Flouro room:  On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer failed to provide personnel radiation monitoring equipment to the employees exposing them to radiation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1096 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(2): The radiation area(s) were not conspicuously posted with a sign or signs bearing the radiation caution symbol described in 29 CFR 1910.1096(e)(1) and the words:  "Caution, Radiation Area".  a)  Fluoro room:  On or about June 3, 2013 and at time prior;  the employer failed to label the x-ray room area exposing the employees to radiaton hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.   (a) On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer failed to provide a complete Hazard communication program that includes proper labels and other forms of warnings, complete Material Safety Data Sheets and proper employees information and training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer do not maintain in the workplace copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and shall ensure that they are readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they are in their work area(s).    a)  On or about June 3, 2013 and at time prior to; the employer exposed the employees to chemical hazards in that employees are allowed to handle oxygen tanks, alcohol pads without being provided with the Material Safety Data Sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2013
Abate by
Aug 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.      a)  On or about June 3, 2013 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to chemicals used on site including but not limited to isopropyl alcohol and oxygen tanks without conducting hazard communication training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Eastern Shore Neurology Clinic, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339098501.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.