DECATUR, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: MARCUS PIERSON
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARCUS PIERSON in 288 NORTH FAIRVIEW, DECATUR, IL 62521 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339098899.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARCUS PIERSON
- Site address
- 288 NORTH FAIRVIEW
- City
- DECATUR
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62521
- Mailing
- 1818 E CLAY, DECATUR, IL 62521
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Employees were exposed to fall hazards and struck in the eye injuries while performing roofing activities and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.102 A02
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being worn by the employees did not meet the requirements specified in American National Standards Institute, Z 87.1-1968, Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection: An employee was using a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles and the employee wore sunglasses which did not meet the requirements of Z 87.1-1968, and did not have side shields to protect the eyes from side exposure to flying debris.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person: Employees were exposed to fall hazards and struck in the eye injuries while performing roofing activities and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.The employer did not enforce the wearing of fall protection for all employees.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure: Employees were exposed to a fall hazard over 25 feet while removing and installing roofing material and no fall protection was being used.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339098899.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.