Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MARINE LUMBER OPERATOR, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARINE LUMBER OPERATOR, INC. in 134 LOWER ORANGE STREET, NANTUCKET, MA 02554 (NAICS 444110). OSHA activity number 339103111.

Watch Marine Lumber Operator, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Marine Lumber Operator, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
134 LOWER ORANGE STREET
City
NANTUCKET
State
MA
ZIP
02554
Mailing
134 LOWER ORANGE STREET, NANTUCKET, MA 02554
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
444110
Employees
110
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2525.00 · Current $1768.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): Flights of stairs having four or more risers were not equipped with a standard railing as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section:  Hardware Department Freight Room:  The stairs outside the door next to the loading dock were not equipped with a standard railing on either side.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1767.5
  • — Z (S) $2525

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2525.00 · Current $1768.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  Facility:  Employees operating the forklift had been trained more than three years ago and they had not been re-evaluated since then.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1767.5
  • — Z (S) $2525

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6930.00 · Current $4851.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  Maintenance Shop:  The Delta Rockwell table saw was not equipped with a hood guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4851
  • — Z (S) $6930

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:  Maintenance Shop:  The Delta Rockwell table saw was not equipped with a spreader.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:  Maintenance Shop:  The Delta Rockwell table saw was not equipped with anti-kickback fingers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.23(e)(2): Stair rails did not consist of a top rail, intermediate rail and/or posts:  Lumber barn:  The stair railing on the stairs between the upper and lower levels did not have an intermediate rail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  Yard:  A 10-foot carpet pole attachment, fork extensions, and a man basket were used on the Hyster and Caterpillar LP forklifts without written approval from the forklift manufacturers.  The use of these attachments decreases the capacity of the forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  Yard:  The data plates on the Hyster and Caterpillar LP forklifts did not reflect the use of the 10-foot carpet pole attachment, fork extensions, and a man basket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339103111.