KATY, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: ARMAND ESPINOZA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ARMAND ESPINOZA in 4934 RAUDABAUGH DR., KATY, TX 77494 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339107906.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ARMAND ESPINOZA
- Site address
- 4934 RAUDABAUGH DR.
- City
- KATY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77494
- Mailing
- 15731 TIMBER ROCK DRIVE, HOUSTON, TX 77082
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.403 B01
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: On July 7, 2013, at the job site employees where using flex cords that were damaged, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards from 110 volts AC.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. On June 7, 2013, at the job site on the front side of a wood frame building employees were exposed to falls while working at heights greater than 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $600
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.1053 B16
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired. On June 7, 2013, at the job site, employees used a ladder that had split rails and damaged rungs, exposing them to fall hazards over 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $400
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.1053 B18
- Issued
- Jul 16, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(18): Ladder repairs did not restore the ladder to a condition meeting its original design criteria before the ladder was returned to use: On June 7, 2013, at the job site, employees used a ladder that had split rails and damaged rungs, exposing them to fall hazards over 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339107906.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.