Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MCSWAIN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MCSWAIN MANUFACTURING CORPORATION in 189 CONTAINER PLACE PLANT 1, SPRINGDALE, OH 45246 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339109571.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mcswain Manufacturing Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mcswain Manufacturing Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
189 CONTAINER PLACE PLANT 1
City
SPRINGDALE
State
OH
ZIP
45246
Mailing
382 CIRCLE FREEWAY DR. PLANT 2, WEST CHESTER, OH 45069
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
65
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:   In that below the hook lifting pins were used to lift parts on/off the vertical turret lathes and the lifting pins were not proof tested, rated, or marked with the safe working load limits or capacities. One feasible and useful method of abatement is to comply with ASME B30.20-2003, which requires that the lifting device be legibly marked with the rated load, the manufacturer's name and address, and the serial number. In addition, ASME B30.20-2003 requires under Section 20-1.2.2 Construction, that the load-bearing structural components of a lifting device be designed to withstand stresses imposed by its rated load plus the weight of the lifter, with a minimum design factor of three, based on the yield strength of the material.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2450
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toe-boards:   (a) The mezzanine or roof on top of the tool room restroom was not provided standard guardrailing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1750
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:   (a) There had not been any periodic or at least annual inspections conducted of the energy control (lockout) procedures being performed with records kept.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 E03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(e)(3): Each lockout or tagout device was not removed from each energy isolating device by the employee who had applied the device:    (a) On or about June 10, 2013 and prior one maintenance employee toke off the lockout lock of another maintenance employee from another shift as the employee who applied the lock placed the key to the lock in the maintenance crib area (fenced enclosure) with a note with the key as to what had been done and/or what still needed to be done. They did not follow Section 7.4 on Shift or Personnel changes in the company's written Lockout/Tagout program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.304 G06 VI

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(6)(vi): Exposed noncurrent-carrying metal parts of cord- and plug-connected equipment that could have become energized were not grounded:   (a) At machine #A10, there was a small fan on the table top with a metal frame, metal stand and metal blade guard that was not grounded as it was powered by a two wire cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:   (a) Maintenance employees who performed electrical troubleshooting/voltage testing were not trained on electrical safety related work practices to protect them while conducting such tasks from the hazards of direct or indirect contact or arc flash/arc blast.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2013
Abate by
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:   (a) On or about June 7, 2013, a maintenance employee performed troubleshooting/ voltage testing on 480 VAC 3 phase on the air compressor and was not provided and did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment.       (b) On or about May 12, 2013, a maintenance employee performed troubleshooting/voltage testing on 480 VAC 3 phase for the Toshulin vertical turret lathe machine and was not provided and did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

View Mcswain Manufacturing Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339109571.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.