Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: GAMBINO RIVERA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GAMBINO RIVERA in 911 WEST DREW, HOUSTON, TX 77006 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339110140.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gambino Rivera for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gambino Rivera is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GAMBINO RIVERA
Site address
911 WEST DREW
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77006
Mailing
1706 EUBANKS, HOUSTON, TX 77093
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,212 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    a)  At the worksite, on April 24, 2013, an employee was preparing the exterior of the builiding for siding installation from the pump jack scaffold approximatly 14 feet from ground.  The scaffold was missing a midrail and enrails along the sides and the ends, exposing the employee to falls.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1212
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary:    a)  At the worksite on April 24, 2013, the top portion of the scaffold was attached inadequately at the top and the bottom was not secured to the structure.  This condition exposed the employee to sccaffold collapse.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B14

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2013
Abate by
Jul 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): The employer did not ensure that each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached) where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening was less than 39 inches (1.0 m) above the walking/working surface, were not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system:    a)  At the worksite, on April 24, 2013, an employee was installing siding to the second level patio, approximately 12 feet above ground level.  The employee was not protected against falls.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339110140.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.