Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ELDEAN COMPANY

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELDEAN COMPANY in 2223 SOUTH SHORE DRIVE, MACATAWA, MI 49434 (NAICS 713930). OSHA activity number 339111270.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Eldean Company for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eldean Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ELDEAN COMPANY
Site address
2223 SOUTH SHORE DRIVE
City
MACATAWA
State
MI
ZIP
49434
Mailing
2223 SOUTH SHORE DRIVE, MACATAWA, MI 49434
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713930
Employees
31
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about June 11, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting full-face air purifying respirators while performing recreational boat repair and maintenance activities, and a written respiratory protection program had not been established.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1249.5
  • · Z (S) $1785

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about June 11, 2013, employees were required to wear tight fitting full-face air purifying respirators while performing recreational boat repair and maintenance activities, and the employer had not provided medical evaluations to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $1,488 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:   On or about June 11, 2013,  employees were exposed to struck by and crushing hazards while using an Allis-Chalmers forklift, model ACP70 L PS Dula, serial number AAH113296 in that additions and modifications which affected the capacity and safe operation of the forklift were made.  The manufacturer's label plate listed 54 inch forks as attachments.  However, the forklift was equipped with 74 inch forks and a trailer hitch attachment that was used to move Travelift trailer, model T300, serial number T1051280.  Additionally, the forks had been modified with holes to retain the trailer hitch attachment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1487.5
  • · Z (S) $2975

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2013
Abate by
Aug 8, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  On or about June 11, 2013, employees were operating powered industrial trucks, and the employer failed to certify that an evaluation of each operator's performance had been conducted at least every three years as required by 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet:  On or about June 11, 2013, a list of hazardous chemicals had not been maintained.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1915.502 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1915.502(d)(2): The fire safety plan was not reviewed and updated annually:  On or about June 11, 2013, the employer failed to ensure that the fire safety plan had been reviewed and updated at least annually.  The plan had not been updated with current contact information for key staff.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339111270.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.