Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U.S. POSTAL SERVICE - EVANSVILLE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of U.S. POSTAL SERVICE - EVANSVILLE in 800 SYCAMORE STREET, EVANSVILLE, IN 47708 (NAICS 491110). OSHA activity number 339116659.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Postal Service - Evansville — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Postal Service - Evansville is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
800 SYCAMORE STREET
City
EVANSVILLE
State
IN
ZIP
47708
Mailing
800 SYCAMORE STREET, EVANSVILLE, IN 47708
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
491110
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 G09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(9): The employer did not follow the work practices and engineering controls for Class III asbestos work specified in 29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(9)(i) through (g)(9)(v), to minimize the exposure to employees:  (a) On or about June 3, 2013, USPS employees were brought into the facility to install the Flat Mail Sorters.  To secure the Flat Mail Sorters, 50 to 60 holes were drilled into the 12x24 plank floor, which contained asbestos material.  Wet methods, local exhaust, barriers, and respirators were not utilized to protect employees from exposure to asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1926.1101 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,785 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1): For employees who use respirators required by 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not provide each employee an appropriate respirator that complied with the requirements of 29 CFR 1926.1101(h):  (a) On or about June 3, 2013, the employer had not provided respirators to the employees exposed to asbestos containing material while drilling on the 12x24 plank.  The employees were not utilizing a wet method and no negative assessment exposure determination had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785
  • — Z (S) $2550

1926.1101 K09 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,168 · Current $1,518 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not ensure participation in the asbestos training program by each employee who was likely to be exposed to asbestos in excess of the permissible exposure limit (PEL), or for each employee engaged in Class I through Class IV asbestos operations:  (a) On or about June 3, 2013, four employees were found to be performing Class III asbestos operations.  They had not been trained to perform this work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1517.6
  • — Z (S) $2168

1910.1001 J07 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(7)(iv): The employer did not provide to all employees who perform housekeeping work in areas where ACM and/or PACM is present, an asbestos awareness training course covering the health effects of asbestos; and/or locations of ACM and/or recognition of ACM and PACM damage and deterioration and/or requirements in this standard related to housekeeping, and/or proper response to fiber release episodes:  (a) On or about June 28, 2013, it was determined that custodial/housekeeping staff were exposed to asbestos that was contained in the mastic and plank tiles in the Work Area.  These employees had not received annual asbestos awareness training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K07 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2013
Abate by
Sep 20, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,168 · Current $1,518 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7)(i): Warning signs that demarcated the regulated area were not provided and displayed at such a distance from regulated areas that an employee may read the signs an take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs:  (a) On or about June 3, 2013, employees, which included clerks and custodians,  were exposed to a Class III asbestos work regulated area.  No signs were posted that warned employees of the asbestos hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1517.6
  • — Z (S) $2168

1910.1001 J05 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 43 exposed
Issued
Aug 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(5)(i): The employer did not affix signs or labels so that employees would be notified of what materials contain ACM and/or PACM to materials that were previously identified to be ACM and/or PACM  (a) On or about June 18, 2013, the employer had not labeled the work area, so that employees entering the area were informed that the mastic and plank floor contained asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View U.S. Postal Service - Evansville's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339116659.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.