BOZEMAN, MT ·
OSHA Inspection: 3 D'S, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of 3 D'S, INC. in 2020 WEST BABCOCK, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 (NAICS 812332). OSHA activity number 339117475.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- 3 D'S, INC.
- Site address
- 2020 WEST BABCOCK
- City
- BOZEMAN
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59718
- Mailing
- 2020 WEST BABCOCK, BOZEMAN, MT 59718
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 812332
- Employees
- 31
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: (a) Laundry: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the employees were working with corrosives including but not limited to: QUAT (Alky benzylammonium chloride, Didecyl dimethylammonium chloride) and Ammonium Hydroxide, without availability to an eye wash station.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,920 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Laundry: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the interlock on the machine guarding bar installed to prevent an employee from the amputation hazard of being pulled into the hot rollers on the Huebsch Roller Irons were not working and therefore could not stop the machine operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3920
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o) (a) Laundry: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to unguarded pulleys when operating the Cissell Industrial Washer with the back cover removed, subjecting them to the direct hazard of rotating drum drive pulleys.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o) (a) Laundry: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to unguarded vertical belts when operating the Cissell Industrial Washer with the back cover removed, subjecting them to the direct hazard of rotating belts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: (a) Commercial Ironing area: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to the hazard of injecting air into their skin when using an air nozzle with air pressures greater than 100 p.s.i. to clean dust/lint from equipment and themselves.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: (a) Electrical room: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the employer did not maintain front covers on all the electrical panels.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1960
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.303 F01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(1): Each disconnecting means required by Subpart S of Part 1910 for motors and appliances was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: (a) Electrical room: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the employer had not marked all the breakers in the electrical panels to indicate their purpose.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.304 F01 IV
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel: (a) Medical Laundry area: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior, employees were exposed to trips, falls and the hazards associated with being unable to de-energize equipment in the event of an emergency. The breaker panels in the electrical alcoves were blocked by storage.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1470
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: (a) Commercial Laundry: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the employer did not have a written Exposure Control Plan, and employees are exposed to blood and contaminated sharps.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.1030 D04 III A 2 I
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iii)(A)(2)(i): During use, containers for contaminated sharps were not easily accessible to personnel or located as close as was feasible to the immediate area where sharps were used or could be reasonably anticipated to be found: (a) At the Facility: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the employer did not have a sharps container in the Medical Linen Commercial Laundry area.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: (a) Laundry: On or about 13 June 2013 and at times prior the employees who voluntarily wore filtering face piece respirators were not given the information contained in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 F02 IV
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in appendix A: (a) At the Facility: On or about 21 May 2012 and at times prior the Employer failed to maintain records that documented the timely signing of the Hepatitis B declination sheet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $700
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 812332)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339117475.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.