BRIDGETON, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: AAA TRAILER SERVICES
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AAA TRAILER SERVICES in 4605 CROSSROADS INDUSTRIAL, BRIDGETON, MO 63044 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 339122210.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AAA TRAILER SERVICES
- Site address
- 4605 CROSSROADS INDUSTRIAL
- City
- BRIDGETON
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63044
- Mailing
- 4605 CROSSROADS INDUSTRIAL, BRIDGETON, MO 63044
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811198
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01 II
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not communicate personal protective equipment selection decision(s) to each affected employee: Shop: Employees who used personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, ear plugs, safety glasses, cutting and welding gloves were not provided required information about the selection criteria.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1470
- · Z (S) $2100
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: Shop: A written certification of personal protective equipment program was not developed and instituted for employees who used personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to ear plugs, gloves, and safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted, at least, once every three years: Establishment: Operators of forklifts were not certified in over 3 years. One of the operators had not been certified in over 15 years.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Establishment: Forklifts with defects such as, but not limited to, damaged tires, brake pedals with missing slip resistant pads, were operated by employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined, at least, daily before being placed in service: Establishment: Daily safety examinations of the forklifts were not conducted to detect defects such as, but not limited to, damaged tires and loose anchor pins on lifting devices.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Shop: Employees who used hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Red Iron Primer, which contained Acetone, and Toluene, were not provided a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1470
- · Z (S) $2100
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811198)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339122210.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.