CLEARWATER, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: SUNCOAST COACH SERVICE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUNCOAST COACH SERVICE, INC. in 2165 CALUMET STREET, CLEARWATER, FL 33765 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 339123457.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUNCOAST COACH SERVICE, INC.
- Site address
- 2165 CALUMET STREET
- City
- CLEARWATER
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33765
- Mailing
- 2165 CALUMET STREET, CLEARWATER, FL 33765
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 G03
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(3): Approved metal waste cans were not provided wherever rags or waste were impregnated with finishing material and all such rags or waste were not deposited therein immediately after use: (a) at the workplace - a cardboard box was used in the spray paint room to discard of rags used to wipe lacquer thinner; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $720
- · Z (S) $1200
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) at the workplace - there was not a written respiratory protection program where employees were required to wear a respirator to spray paint; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) at the workplace - employees who were required to wear a respirator did not receive a medical evaluation prior to respirator use; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) at the workplace - employees who were required to wear a respirator did not receive a fit test prior to use; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): (a) at the workplace - each forklift operator was not trained; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 9, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: (a) at the workplace - forklift operators were not required to inspect the forklift before use; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) at the workplace - there was not a written hazard communication program where employees worked with chemicals including, but not limited to, lacquer thinner and paint; observed on or about 6/18/13.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339123457.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.