BETHEL, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: LJT COSNTRUCTION CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LJT COSNTRUCTION CORP in 9-12 HUNTING RIDGE DRIVE, BETHEL, CT 06801 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339124562.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LJT COSNTRUCTION CORP
- Site address
- 9-12 HUNTING RIDGE DRIVE
- City
- BETHEL
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06801
- Mailing
- PO BOX 8473, SLEEPY HOLLOW, NY 10591
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the mployees who were operating pneumatic nail guns were provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Worksite: The employees who were performing work on a steep pitch roof with a fall distance of greater than 12 were not protected from falling.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 6, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all employees exposed to fall hazards were trained in the hazards associated with falling and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 12, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladders length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Worksite: Employees were accessing the roof by two aluminum extension ladders, and the side rails of both ladders did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339124562.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.