LACEYS SPRING, AL —
OSHA Inspection: C & C FABRICATION COMPANY, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of C & C FABRICATION COMPANY, INC. in 30 FABRICATION ROAD, LACEYS SPRING, AL 35754 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 339126351.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C & C FABRICATION COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 30 FABRICATION ROAD
- City
- LACEYS SPRING
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35754
- Mailing
- 30 FABRICATION ROAD PO BOX 70, LACEYS SPRING, AL 35754
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 55
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): Visible gauges or audible alarm or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity is maintained: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Spray booth, the booth was not equipped with a visible gauge (manometer) or alarm.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.107 B05 IV
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Spray booth, the downstream side of the filter was not protected with automatic sprinklers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 G03
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(3): Approved metal waste cans were not provided wherever rags or waste were impregnated with finishing material: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Spray area, waste and other material impregnated with paint were placed in an open-top plastic can.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.107 G05
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(5): The use of solvents for cleaning operations was not restricted to those having flashpoints not less than 100 F: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Spray booth, epoxy thinner with a flash point of 32 degrees F was used to clean spray nozzles and equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.124 H04
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.124(h)(4): For employees who work with chromic acid, periodic examinations of their exposed body parts, especially their nostrils: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Dip tank area, periodic examinations were not provided for employees engaged in chrome plating activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Paint area, a written respiratory protection program was not developed and implemented for employee(s) required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, the Binks half-mask respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Paint area, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to an employee required to wear a respirator such as, but not limited to, the Binks half-mask respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Paint area, an employee, provided and required to wear a respirator such as, but not limited to, the Binks half-mask respirator, had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Facility, a written hazard communication program had not been developed and implemented for employees working with various paint products such as, but not limited to, polyurethane, primer, and paint thinner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Dip tank area, dip tanks were not labeled to identify their contents.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Sep 5, 2013
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a) On or about June 17, 2013 - Dip tank area, dip tanks were not marked with information regarding the hazards of their contents.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at C & C Fabrication Company, INC.
View C & C Fabrication Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339126351.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.