Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: O.O. ENTERPRISES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of O.O. ENTERPRISES in NU'ULI - MAIN ROAD, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 424410). OSHA activity number 339127276.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch O.O. Enterprises for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for O.O. Enterprises is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
O.O. ENTERPRISES
Site address
NU'ULI - MAIN ROAD
City
PAGO PAGO
State
AS
ZIP
96799
Mailing
P.O. BOX 3897, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424410
Employees
30
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2013
Abate by
Sep 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent):    On or about June 13, 2013, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards by not providing a standard guard railing for the 2nd floor mezzanine in the main warehouse loading and unloading area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.23 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2013
Abate by
Sep 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1): The employer did not provide standard railings or guards on stairways having four or more risers.    On or about June 13, 2013, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards by not providing a standard guard rail for the stair leading to upper level and the apartment above the main warehouse storage area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.136 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards:    On or about June 13, 2013, the employer failed to protect employees from injuries to their feet - employees were observed moving a refridgerator without protective footwear.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    On or abour June 13, 2013 the employer exposed employees to electrical hazards from the use of a power strip used to power an air conditioner, which exceeded the rating for the power strip.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:  On or about June 13, 2013, the employer failed to protect employees from electrical hazards by using extension cords instead of permanant wiring.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jul 23, 2013
Abate by
Aug 2, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap:  ON or about June 13, 2013, the employer did not protect employees from electrical hazards when extension cords used in the facility were spliced.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View O.O. Enterprises's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339127276.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.