Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: 1303 CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of 1303 CONSTRUCTION in 504 DAHL ST., DE FOREST, WI 53532 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 339127995.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 1303 Construction for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 1303 Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
1303 CONSTRUCTION
Site address
504 DAHL ST.
City
DE FOREST
State
WI
ZIP
53532
Mailing
1303 PRAIRIE RD., MADISON, WI 53711
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2013
Abate by
Aug 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.                            On or about June 20, 2013, employees using a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles on a roof were not provided with safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $400
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.              On or about June 20, 2013, employees installing shingles on a residential roof were not protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.                  On or about June 20, 2013, employees were using a portable ladder to access the upper landing of a residential roof, of which, the ladder did not extend at least three feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339127995.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.