GRIFFIN, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: SWANTON WELDING & MACHINING CO., INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SWANTON WELDING & MACHINING CO., INC. in 385 HUDSON ROAD, GRIFFIN, GA 30224 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 339128225.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SWANTON WELDING & MACHINING CO., INC.
- Site address
- 385 HUDSON ROAD
- City
- GRIFFIN
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30224
- Mailing
- 385 HUDSON ROAD, GRIFFIN, GA 30224
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 115
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.38 A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.38(a): The employer did not establish a written emergency evacuation plan for employees expected to evacuate in the event of a fire or other emergency. a) Production Area - The employer had not implemented a written emergency response plan (EAP) for the 36 non-union employees working in the facility. The employer failed to communicate procedures to the employees in an event of a fire or other emergency evacuation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1620
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.147 C07 I B
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure: a) Production Area - The employer did not ensure that all affected employees were provided with lockout/tagout training before allowing them to operate on the equipment such as but not limited to the drill press, laser machine, robotic welder, press brake; and other equipment in the production area. Employees were exposed to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2160
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.252 B02 I A
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(i)(A): Helmets or hand shields were not used during all arc welding or arc cutting operations: Production Area - The employer did not ensure the employees conducting mig and tig welding were wearing a face shield or helmets. Employees were exposed to burns and flying particles to the face and eyes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2700
- · Z (S) $4500
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 11, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields: a) Production Area - The employer did not provide welding screens while workers were performing mid and tact welding. Employees working in adjacent areas in the production were exposed to ultraviolent radiation from the welding operations.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.303 F02
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder, and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or overcurrent device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident: a) Production Area - All circuit breakers on the 208Y/120V and 480 voltages panel box were not marked for their intended purposes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1620
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement and maintain at the workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g) and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met: a) Production Area - The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program employees on the hazardous chemicals, such as but not limited to propane, anti-spatter (Dimethyl Ether and White Mineral Oil), nitrogen, titanium dioxide, argon, diesel fuel, nozzle gel (Petrolatum).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1620
- · Z (S) $2700
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Production Area - The employer did not provide any training to the employees on the hazardous chemicals that were being used on site, such as but not limited to propane, anti-spatter (Dimethyl Ether and White Mineral Oil), nitrogen, titanium dioxide, argon, nozzle gel (Petrolatum).
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The certification did not include the name of the operator, the date of the training, the date of the evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation: a) Production Area - The employer did not certify that all employees operating the forklift trucks were trained and evaluated. The employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Aug 29, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) Production Area - The plastic spray bottle was not labeled to identify the content therein and warning hazards. The Anti-spatter (Dimethyl Ether and White Mineral Oil) is used during welding operation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Swanton Welding & Machining CO., INC.
View Swanton Welding & Machining CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339128225.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.