DANBURY, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: NICOLETTI HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NICOLETTI HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC in 72 PATCH STREET, DANBURY, CT 06810 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339129991.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NICOLETTI HOME IMPROVEMENT LLC
- Site address
- 72 PATCH STREET
- City
- DANBURY
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06810
- Mailing
- 48 40 ACRE MOUNTAIN ROAD, DANBURY, CT 06811
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working from a ladder jack scaffold were provided with fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2800
- · I (S) $1950
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the ladder jack scaffold was erected under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed: Worksite: Fiberglass step ladders that were being used in the closed postion to access the roof in a manner similar to a "chicken ladder" were not being used as designed by the manufacturer.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all employees who were performing work on a steep pitched roof were provided with fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2800
- · I (S) $1950
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 15, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all employees were trained in the hazards associated with falling and the proper ways and procedures to take in order to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $0
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339129991.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.