Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARMANDO FIGUEROA

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of ARMANDO FIGUEROA in 8930 GALE WOOD DR., AUSTIN, TX 78758 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339132029.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Armando Figueroa for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Armando Figueroa is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ARMANDO FIGUEROA
Site address
8930 GALE WOOD DR.
City
AUSTIN
State
TX
ZIP
78758
Mailing
694 MESA DR., DEL VALLE, TX 78617
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (J)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Because of the portable ladder's length, the ladder side rails did not extend to at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access.  On or about 20 June 2013, seven employees were utilizing a 20 foot, folding, mulit-purpose ladder to access the roof without extending the ladder at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet to the concrete street below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  On or about 20 June 2013, an employee was utilizing a pneumatic nail gun to secure composition shingles to the roof of the apartment building without eye protection, exposing the employee to the hazard of being struck by flying objects.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  On or about 20 June 2013, seven workers were removing and replacing composition roof shingles on the roof of the apartment building without utilizing fall protection, exposing the employees to a fall hazard of approximately 18 feet in height to the concrete street below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 7 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2013
Abate by
Aug 6, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.   On or about 20 June 2013, seven workers were removing and replacing composition roof shingles on the roof of the apartment building without the employer providing fall protection training, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 18 feet onto the concrete floor below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339132029.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.