BURLINGTON, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: CIRCLE INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CIRCLE INCORPORATED in 2756 WHITING RD, BURLINGTON, WI 53105 (NAICS 322299). OSHA activity number 339133290.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CIRCLE INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 2756 WHITING RD
- City
- BURLINGTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53105
- Mailing
- PO BOX 697, BURLINGTON, WI 53105
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 322299
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A02
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there was a hazard from flying objects. (a) In the production area, the employer did not ensure that all employee(s) wore adequate eye protection with side shields while operating the Delta radial arm saw.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1785
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) The employer did not develop procedures for controlling hazardous energy while performing maintenance and/or servicing on equipment, such as but not limited to replacing a valve on the Bruno die press.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the actions listed in and was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6): (a) The employer did not ensure that employees who change and/or adjust blades on the slitting machines, including slitters 1, 2, 3, and the Gandria Roda, followed the sequence of actions to de-energize the equipment it prior to performing the work.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.147 F03 II D
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: (a) The employer did not ensure that each authorized employee applied a lock to the hasp while performing maintenance work, such as but not limited to, replacing valves on the Bruno die press.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by rotating saw blades: (a) In the production area, the employer did not ensure the Delta Rockwell radial saw blade was adequately guarded in that the right side guard was stuck in a raised position causing it to not self-adjust to the stock thickness. (b) In the production area, the employer did not ensure the Delta Rockwell radial saw blade did not extend beyond the table.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $3500
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guards, where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet above the floor or working level, had openings larger than one half inch: (a) In the production area, near the laminator, the employer did not ensure that a box fan (model and serial number unknown) was properly guarded in that the plastic guard had a 2 inch opening. (b) In the production area, near the Bruno die press, the employer did not ensure the Diehl fan was properly guarded in that it had 1 3/4 inch openings.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $2975
1910.304 G06 VI
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(6)(vi): Exposed noncurrent-carrying metal parts of cord- and plug-connected equipment that could have become energized were not grounded: (a) In the production area near the laminator, the employer did not ensure that the box fan (model and serial number unknown) was grounded from metal parts becoming energized.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 8, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were provided the information outlined in Appendix D of the Respiratory Protection Standard before using a voluntary use particulate mask for operations such as but not limited to generating dust from the sawing equipment.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: (a) The employer did not create a written Exposure Control Plan for designated first responders to help prevent exposures to bloodborne pathogens from blood or other potentially infectious materials.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 322299)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339133290.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.