BRAINTREE, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: MARIA CELA
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MARIA CELA in 70-72 FRANKLIN STREET, BRAINTREE, MA 02184 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339134231.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARIA CELA
- Site address
- 70-72 FRANKLIN STREET
- City
- BRAINTREE
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02184
- Mailing
- 92 CHERRY STREET, BROCKTON, MA 02301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying exis(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY THE HAZARDOUS CONDITION AND THE DEFICIENT ACTION) Location: Jobsite An employee fell and was seriously injured while roofing on a residential jobsite that had not been inspected for hazardous working conditions by a competent person
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.502 D21
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service: Location: Jobsite An employee fell 21 feet and 2 inches from a roof to the ground below where the personal fall arrest system and components he had been using, which had not been adequately inspected prior to use, failed to protect the employee from a fall
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D15 II
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15)(ii): Anchorage points for personal fall arrest systems were not installed and used under the supervision of a qualified person. Location: Jobsite Employees were exposed to falls of 21 feet from the rooftop to the ground below, while utilizing and wearing deficient personal fall arrest systems and anchors that were not installed and used under the supervision of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii) Location: Jobsite Employees were not adequately trained in the use of personal fall arrest systems where an employee fell 21 feet from a roof to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A02 II
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(ii): The employer did not assure that each employee, as necessary, had been trained by a competent person in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used: Location: Jobsite An employee fell 21 feet from a roof to the ground below, where employees had not been properly trained in the procedures for erecting, installing, inspecting and maintaining a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.503 A02 III
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person in the use and operation of guardrail systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used. Location: Jobsite An employee fell 21 feet from a roof to the ground below, where employees had not been adequately trained in the use of personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339134231.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.