HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: H & M PLATING COMPANY, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of H & M PLATING COMPANY, INC. in 6035 PLAINVIEW STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77087 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339143091.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- H & M PLATING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 6035 PLAINVIEW STREET
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77087
- Mailing
- 6035 PLAINVIEW STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77087
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- Employees
- 70
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 C
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc: a) At the facility, near the chrome dipping tanks, where there was no standard guardrailing or floor covering to prevent employees from falling into the pit below.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2520
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: a) At the facility, in the abrasive blasting area, where the employer stores corrosive material such as, but not limited to, hydrochloric acid. There was no quick drenching station in the vicinity for immediate use in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3500
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: a) At the facility, in the chrome shop locker room, where a basket containing protective clothing contaminated with hexavalent chromium was not labeled. b) At the facility, in the abrasive blasting building, where a 55-gallon drum of used grinding fluid was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: a) At the facility, in the chrome shop locker room, where a basket containing protective clothing contaminated with hexavalent chromium was not labeled. b) At the facility, in the abrasive blasting building, where a 55-gallon drum of used grinding fluid was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): When the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible, the employer did not provide the respirator users with the information in Appendix D of this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirator When Not Required Under the Standard"): a) At the facility, where the employer had not provided employees with Appendix D prior to permitting employees to use North elastomeric half-face respirators on a voluntary basis. This condition exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $420
- — Z (O) $700
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Sep 18, 2013
- Abate by
- Oct 19, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: a) At the facility, where the employer had not established a respiratory protection program prior to permitting employees to use North elastomeric half-face respirators. This condition exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $420
- — Z (O) $700
More inspections at H & M Plating Company, INC.
View H & M Plating Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339143091.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.