Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: H & M PLATING COMPANY, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of H & M PLATING COMPANY, INC. in 6035 PLAINVIEW STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77087 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 339143091.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch H & M Plating Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for H & M Plating Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6035 PLAINVIEW STREET
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77087
Mailing
6035 PLAINVIEW STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77087
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
70
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(c): Covers and/or guardrails were not provided to protect personnel from the hazards of open pits, tanks, vats, ditches, etc:  a) At the facility, near the chrome dipping tanks, where there was no standard guardrailing or floor covering to prevent employees from falling into the pit below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  a) At the facility, in the abrasive blasting area, where the employer stores corrosive material such as, but not limited to, hydrochloric acid.  There was no quick drenching station in the vicinity for immediate use in the event of an emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 F05 I

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:  a) At the facility, in the chrome shop locker room, where a basket containing protective clothing contaminated with hexavalent chromium was not labeled.    b) At the facility, in the abrasive blasting building, where a 55-gallon drum of used grinding fluid was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 F05 II

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2013
Abate by
Sep 26, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:  a) At the facility, in the chrome shop locker room, where a basket containing protective clothing contaminated with hexavalent chromium was not labeled.    b) At the facility, in the abrasive blasting building, where a 55-gallon drum of used grinding fluid was not labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): When the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible, the employer did not provide the respirator users with the information in Appendix D of this section ("Information for Employees Using Respirator When Not Required Under the Standard"):  a) At the facility, where the employer had not provided employees with Appendix D prior to permitting employees to use North elastomeric half-face respirators on a voluntary basis.  This condition exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $420
  • — Z (O) $700

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 18, 2013
Abate by
Oct 19, 2013
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  a) At the facility, where the employer had not established a respiratory protection program prior to permitting employees to use North elastomeric half-face respirators.  This condition exposed employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $420
  • — Z (O) $700

View H & M Plating Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339143091.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.