RUTHERFORD, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: FDP CONSTRUCTION LLC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FDP CONSTRUCTION LLC. in 159 DONALDSON AVENUE, RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339146516.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FDP CONSTRUCTION LLC.
- Site address
- 159 DONALDSON AVENUE
- City
- RUTHERFORD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07070
- Mailing
- 529 STUYVESANT STREET 3RD FLOOR, IRVINGTON, NJ 07111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: A) Front right side of house: Employees were exposed to head injuries while working below siding activities. The employees were not protected by hard hats or protective helmets, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. A) Front of house: An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a Dewalt saw. The employee was not protected by eye/face protection, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level. A) Front roof of house: An employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while engaged in siding work on a residential structure. The exposed employee was not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): A) Front roof of house: Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while engaged in siding work on a residential structure. The exposed employees were not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: A) Front left side of house Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while using an extension ladder to access a roof landing. The ladder that was used, did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step: A) Back right side of house An employee was exposed to fall/ladder collapse hazards as they were using the top steps of an 8 foot folding step ladder, on or about May 17th 2013.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339146516.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.