Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: FDP CONSTRUCTION LLC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FDP CONSTRUCTION LLC. in 159 DONALDSON AVENUE, RUTHERFORD, NJ 07070 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339146516.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch FDP Construction LLC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for FDP Construction LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
159 DONALDSON AVENUE
City
RUTHERFORD
State
NJ
ZIP
07070
Mailing
529 STUYVESANT STREET 3RD FLOOR, IRVINGTON, NJ 07111
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
12
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.100(a):   Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   A) Front right side of house: Employees were exposed to head injuries while working below siding activities. The employees were not protected by hard hats or protective helmets, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):   Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   A) Front of house:  An employee was exposed to eye/face injuries while using a Dewalt  saw.  The employee was not protected by eye/face protection, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.  A) Front roof of house: An employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while engaged in siding work on a residential structure. The exposed employee was not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):   Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    A) Front roof of house:  Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while engaged in siding work on a residential structure. The exposed employees were not protected by any type of fall protection system, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):   Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet  above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:   A) Front left side of house      Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12 feet while using an extension ladder to access a roof landing. The ladder that was used, did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing, on or about May 17th, 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 17, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13):   The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:   A) Back right side of house    An employee was exposed to fall/ladder collapse hazards as they were using the top steps of an 8 foot folding step ladder, on or about May 17th 2013.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339146516.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.