Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: K-T BOLT MANUFACTURING INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of K-T BOLT MANUFACTURING INC. in 1150 FORT BEND ROAD, KATY, TX 77494 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 339148660.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch K-T Bolt Manufacturing INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for K-T Bolt Manufacturing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1150 FORT BEND ROAD
City
KATY
State
TX
ZIP
77494
Mailing
1150 FORT BEND ROAD, KATY, TX 77494
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
64
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards of being struck-by bolts lifted by two Budgit 1/2 Ton underhung hoist with severe signs of corrosion on the chains and hooks which are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.       This violation was observed on or about June 24, 2013, in the Electro Polish Area where an employee was exposed to being struck-by loads of bolts being lifted by two Budgit 1/2 Ton underhung hoists with severe signs of corrosion on the chains and hooks.        Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps it is taking to ensure that hoist chains and hooks are maintained without corrosion.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Dec 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically specify procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:     The employer does not ensure that procedures clearly and specifically specify procedural steps for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in activities covered by this section.     a)   This violation occurred on or about June 24, 2013 in the production area, where press operators and maintenance employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when performing set-up or maintenance tasks on the following equipment such as, but not limited to      1.   Bliss S1-200-30-36    2.   Bliss S1-200-30-26   3.   Bliss S1-200-30-46                            b)   This violation occurred on or about June 24, 2013 and at times prior thereto, in the production area where press operators and maintenance employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when performing set-up or maintenance tasks on the following equipment such as, but not limited to:     1.  Budgit, 1/2 Ton Hoist, Electro Polish, Pneumatic   2.  Budgit, 1/2 Ton Hoist, Electro Polish, Pneumatic   3.  Dynopower Rectifier, 77126-001-001     4.  Filtration System ( 220147)         Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps and procedures that will be developed, which specify procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines to control hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):         The employer does not ensure that all energy isolating devices were physically located and operated to isolate energy.  This violation occurred on or about June 24, 2013 in the production area, where employees were exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when performing set-up and maintenance tasks on the following equipment such as but not limited to:      1.  Bliss S1-200-30-36    2.  Bliss S1-200-30-26    3.  Bliss S1-200-30-46      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R.  1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including the steps that ensure energy isolating devices are physically located and operated to isolate the machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1050
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    The employer does not guard the rotating parts of machines whose operation exposes employees to injury.      a). This violation was observed on or about June 24, 2013 in Building 1, threader area,  where employee was exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when operating a Landis threader 2.5" , 2L71 without a chuck guard.     b) This violation was observed on or about June 24, 2013 in Building 1, machine shop area, where employee was exposed to struck-by and caught-in hazards when operating a Jones and Lamson #3 vertical lathe, serial number 202307 with a raised chuck guard.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all machines that have exposed rotating parts are guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.217 B07 V A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.217(b)(7)(v)(a): Each two hand control for single stroke operations on mechanical power press(es) using part revolution clutches was not arranged by design, construction and/or separation so that the concurrent use of both hands was required.       The employer does not ensure that each two-handed control for single stroke operations on mechanical power presses using part revolution clutches is arranged by design or construction so that the concurrent use of both hands is required.  This violation occurred on or about June 24, 2013 in the fabrication department, where employees were exposed to amputation hazards when using the Bliss forging press without a two-handed control to initiate the stroke.             Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that each two-handed control for single stroke operations on mechanical power presses using part revolution clutches is arranged by design or construction so that the concurrent use of both hands is required.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.305 G02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Sep 16, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap.          The employer does not ensure flexible cords were used without splices.  This violation was observed on or about June 24, 2013 in the mechanic shop, where an employee was exposed to electrical hazards while operating a radio with a flexible cord spliced to a dissimilar cord.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that all flexible cords are used without splices or taps.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1050
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.304 F01 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 6, 2013
Abate by
Sep 23, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(iv): Overcurrent devices for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, were not readily accessible to each employee or authorized building management personnel.   The employer does not ensure that electrical devices and panels are readily accessible.  This violation was observed on or about June 24, 2013 in the machine shop, where the overcurrent devices were obstructed with a microwave oven, refrigerator and cleaning equipment.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that employees have ready access to circuit breaker and/or panels.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View K-T Bolt Manufacturing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339148660.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.