Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BPR/RICO MANUFACTURING INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BPR/RICO MANUFACTURING INC. in 691 WEST LIBERTY STREET, MEDINA, OH 44256 (NAICS 333924). OSHA activity number 339149577.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bpr/Rico Manufacturing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bpr/Rico Manufacturing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
691 WEST LIBERTY STREET
City
MEDINA
State
OH
ZIP
44256
Mailing
691 WEST LIBERTY STREET, MEDINA, OH 44256
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333924
Employees
77
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 A02 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,975 · Current $4,050
29 CFR 1910.147(a)(2)(ii)(B): An employee is required to place any part of his or her body into an area on a machine or piece of equipment where work is actually performed upon the material being processed (point of operation) or where an associated danger zone exists during a machine operating cycle.     a)  On or about June 7, 2013, during setup operations on the DOOSAN PUMA 2100Y, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from hazardous energy, at the point of operation, by controlling the hazardous energy through lockout tagout.    b)   On or about June 27, 2013, during adjusting or changing of the spindle liner on the DOOSAN PUMA 2100Y lathe, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from hazardous energy, by controlling the hazardous energy through lockout tagout.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4050
  • — C (S) $2975
  • — Z (S) $2975

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2013
Abate by
Sep 27, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.  For approximately six weeks prior and as of June 27, 2013, during production operations on the DOOSAN Puma 2100SY, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from rotating parts, at the spindle liner, by one or more means of guarding.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Bpr/Rico Manufacturing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339149577.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.