BAY HEAD, NJ ·
OSHA Inspection: B & A IMPROVEMENT, LLC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of B & A IMPROVEMENT, LLC. in 680 ROUTE 35 SOUTH/MAIN AVENUE, BAY HEAD, NJ 08742 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339150211.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- B & A IMPROVEMENT, LLC.
- Site address
- 680 ROUTE 35 SOUTH/MAIN AVENUE
- City
- BAY HEAD
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 08742
- Mailing
- 260 MORRIS AVENUE, LONG BRANCH, NJ 07740
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard: a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: Employer did not initiate and maintain a safety and health program for employees performing cedar shingle replacement/repair and other related activities at the worksite. Condition observed on or about 06/05/13. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): Frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment to be conducted by a competent person designated by the employer was not provided by the employer who was responsible to initiate and maintain an accident prevention program: a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: A competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite. Employees on this site were exposed to hazards including, but not limited to fall and electrical hazards. Condition noted on or about 06/05/13. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: Employees were not trained in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions to include by not limited to those associated with pitched roofs, fall hazards, electrical hazards, and working in the proximity of live power lines. Condition observed on or about 06/05/13. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.403 E
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.403(e): Conductors were not spliced or joined with splicing devices designed for the use or by brazing, welding, or soldering with a fusible metal or alloy:ALLEGED VIOLATION DESCRIPTION (A.V.D.): (a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARDS WHERE NECESSARY) a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: Employer had spliced together two extension cords without using splicing devices designed for the use nor did the employer braize, weld, or solder the splice with a feasible metal or device. Vioation observed on or about 06/05/13.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means. a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: A company employee, performing roofing and other related activities, was exposed to electrocution hazards when working less than three feet from a live power line. Condition noted on or bout 06/05/13.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: Employees were exposed to fall hazards, in excess of 22 feet 5 inches to the ground below, when they were not supplied with any fall protection when performing roofing and other related activities from a pitched roof. Condition observed on or about 06/05/13.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2013
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed: a- 680 Route 35 South/Main Avenue, Bayhead NJ: Employees were using a closed A-framed ladder, resting against a pitched roof, to access another level of the struture's roof. This ladder in question is designed to be used in the fully open position with the legs locked open. As such, the employees were exposed to fall hazard in excess of 22 feet 5 inches to the ground surface below. Condition observed on or about 06/05/13. NOTE: IN ADDITION TO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION, THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION FOR THIS ITEM, FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL RESULT IN AN ADsDITIONAL PENALTY OF $1000.00 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339150211.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.