Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: ADVANCED FINISHING USA

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ADVANCED FINISHING USA in 7401 KLIER DRIVE, FAIRVIEW, PA 16415 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339150815.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Advanced Finishing USA for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Advanced Finishing USA is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7401 KLIER DRIVE
City
FAIRVIEW
State
PA
ZIP
16415
Mailing
7401 KLIER DRIVE, FAIRVIEW, PA 16415
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
40
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 I05 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2013
Abate by
Nov 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iii): Sorbent beds and filters suitable for in-lne air-purifying were not maintained and replaced or refurbished periodically following the manufacturer's instructions.  a.) G.E. Unit Batch Area, right side - On or about 6/27/2013, company employees utilized a supplied breathing air system during spraying operations.  The last change date for the canister filter connected to the breathing air supply line was approximately one year ago.  b.) G.E. Unit Batch Area, left side - On or about 6/27/2013, company employees utilized a supplied breathing air system during spraying operations.  The last change date for the canister fllter connected to the breathing air supply line was approximately one year ago.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 I05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2013
Abate by
Nov 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(5)(iv): The employer did not ensure that the person authorized to perform the necessary sorbent bed and filter changes filled out a tag indicating by the signature and date that maintenance changes were performed:  a.) G.E. Unit Batch Area, right side - On or about 6/27/2013, employees utilized a supplied breathing air system during spraying operations. The last change date for the canister filter connected to the breathing air supply line could not be verified as no tag was available.  b.) G.E. Unit Batch Area, left side - On or about 6/27/2013, company employees utilized a supplied breathing air system during spraying operations. The last change date for the canister fllter connected to the breathing air supply line could not be verified as no tag was available.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 I07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2013
Abate by
Nov 21, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(i)(7): Oil lubricated compressor(s) used to supply breathing air did not have a high-temperature or carbon monoxide alarm(s) or both:    a.) Air Compressor, Compressor Area Rear of Building - On or about 6/27/2013, employees utilized a supplied breathing air system during spray coating operations in the G.E. Unit Batch Area. The carbon monoxide detector for the system had been removed for calibration.  A replacement detector had not been installed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Oct 25, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.   a.) Eye Wash between coating lines - employees were exposed to a sulfuric acid etch mist near the beginning of the first coating line.  The eyewash unit in the area was not maintained properly in that there was a low flow of water from the eye wash fixtures to the extent that the water would not have reached an injured individual's face.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339150815.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.