Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ENERGY AMERICAS WEST

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY ENERGY AMERICAS WEST in 3171 N. GAFFEY ST, SAN PEDRO, CA 90731 (NAICS 424710). OSHA activity number 339156903.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas West for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas West is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3171 N. GAFFEY ST
City
SAN PEDRO
State
CA
ZIP
90731
Mailing
3171 N. GAFFEY ST, SAN PEDRO, CA 90731
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424710
Employees
31
Ownership type
Federal government (D)

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition.  COR Office:  On June 26, 2013, a bag and binders stored on the floor presented tripping hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.38 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(d):  An employer did not have and/or maintain an employee alarm system. The employee alarm system did not use a distinctive signal for each purpose that complied with the requirements in 29 CFR 1910.165:  Tank Farm:  On September 26, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure an effective alert system in that radios and telephones were unreliable.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.38 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(f)(1): The employer did not review the emergency action plan with each employee covered by the plan when  the employee was assigned initially to a job:  On September 26, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the employer failed to review the "Red Plan" with employees covered by the plan at the time of their initial assignment.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.106 B02 V A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(b)(2)(v)(a): Every above ground storage tank did not have some form of construction or device that will relieve excessive internal pressure caused by exposure fires:  Main terminal, Mixing Area, Stadis 450 tank:  On September 26, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the steel atmospheric tank was not equipped with a pressure relief venting device.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.106 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(c)(1)(i): The design (including selection of materials) fabrication, assembly, test, and inspection of piping systems containing flammable or combustible liquids were not suitable for the expected working pressures and structural stresses and/or did not conform with the applicable provisions of Pressure Piping, ANSI B31 series and the provisions of this paragraph:  a) Main terminal, Pumphouse Building 113, Pump 1 and 2 - On September 26, 2013, and at times prior thereto, the pumps were not provided with pressure relief devices against excessive pressure on the pump or on the discharge side of the pump.  b) Pier 12, JP-8 Line - On November 15, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the operating pressure was greater than the pressure design for the pipe.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.106 C05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(c)(5):  All piping for flammable or combustible liquids, both above ground and underground, where subject to external corrosion, were not painted or otherwise protected.  Main terminal, Valve Pit outside of Pump House Building. 113:  On September 26, 2013 and at times prior thereto, above ground piping, exposed to external corrosion, was not painted or had damaged insulation.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.159 C10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.159(c)(10): The minimum vertical clearance of 18 inches between automatic sprinkler systems sprinklers and the material below was not maintained:  Facility Manager's cubicle:  On June 26, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the vertical clearance between sprinklers and material stored below was 13 inches.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 31 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage:  Building 100, West Wing:  On June 26, 2013 and at times prior thereto, the working space about an electrical panel was used for storage.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.305 G01 IV B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Flexible cords and cables were run through holes in walls, ceilings, or floors:  Pier 12, Control Room:  On November 15, 2013 and at times prior thereto, a flexible cord used to power the Pump Control Panel was run through the ceiling and subjected to damage to the insulation.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1960.8 A

Serious Gravity 10 10 instances 31 exposed
Issued
Feb 13, 2014
Abate by
Mar 12, 2014
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1960.8(a): The Agency head  did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees at Pier 12, the Main Terminal Tank Farm and piping systems of Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) in San Pedro, California where the employees were exposed to potential fire and explosion from the release of flammable liquids in that:   a)      Appropriate tools were not utilized, such as but not limited to, intrinsically safe flashlights and communications equipment where required in controlled areas.   b)      Flammable and combustible storage tanks were located less than 200 feet from the control room and adjacent industry, and were located within close proximity to an active weapons firing range.   c)      The Main Terminal control room was located less than 200 feet from a loading rack.   d)      A portable flammable storage unit was used as a testing laboratory without a hazard identification analysis and design modifications for safe human occupancy.   e)      Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&ID) were not updated after changes and modifications to the system, such as but not limited to, the replacement of ball valves with double block and bleed valves.    f)       Management of Change (MOC) procedures were not utilized for additions, modifications or procedural changes that occurred at the facility, such as but not limited to, modification of control room monitors and valves in the piping system.   g)      Continued monitoring of the control room during loading, pump shutdowns and fuel transfers to control potential unexpected occurrences, leaks, or other emergencies was not maintained.   h)      Emergency stop buttons were not located for effective emergency response.    i)       Effective and continuous means of communication for safe operations was not available.   j.)      No written safety procedures for critical operations, such as but not limited to, conducting Quality Assurance and Quality Control testing at the truck rack, Lab and at Building 103, operating the Pier 12 Loading Arms, or to address tasks that required the operator to leave the control room.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Defense Logistics Agency Energy Americas West's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339156903.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.