WESTON, FL ·
OSHA Inspection: AMEXICO ROOFING INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of AMEXICO ROOFING INC. in 1992 WATER RIDGE DRIVE, WESTON, FL 33326 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339157158.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMEXICO ROOFING INC.
- Site address
- 1992 WATER RIDGE DRIVE
- City
- WESTON
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33326
- Mailing
- 240 NE 27 STREET, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33064
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.300 A
- Issued
- Nov 13, 2013
- Abate by
- Nov 25, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.300(a): Hand tool(s), power tool(s) or similar equipment were not maintained in a safe condition: On or about July 1, 2013, employees were exposed to a shock hazard from a Makita circular saw that had a damaged power cord. PLEASE NOTE: DOCUMENTATION AND CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 13, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about July 01, 2013, at the above addressed location, employees who did not have fall protection were exposed to a fall hazard of at least 9 feet from a roof.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339157158.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.