Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: REDC, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of REDC, INC. in 1761 DOBBS ROAD SUITE 101, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32084 (NAICS 812332). OSHA activity number 339159220.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Redc, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Redc, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
REDC, INC.
Site address
1761 DOBBS ROAD SUITE 101
City
SAINT AUGUSTINE
State
FL
ZIP
32084
Mailing
1761 DOBBS ROAD SUITE 101, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32084
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812332
Employees
16
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Abate by
Oct 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,247 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1340

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:    a. On or about July 1, 2013, the employer had not established a machine specific lockout/tag-out procedure that had been written and implemented for the performance of maintenance or repair on the Feeding Ironers Machine where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of energy sources could occur and cause injury.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1247
  • · Z (S) $1700

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Abate by
Oct 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1340

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(i): Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:  a. On or about July 1, 2013, the employer had not provided locks, tags, chains, or other appropriate hardware for use in isolating, securing, or blocking the burner of the Feeding Ironers Machine from gas energy sources in the shop while employees performed maintenance or repair on the Feeding Ironers Machine.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Abate by
Oct 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 14709953

29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a.  On or about July 1, 2013, at the Dirty Laundry Washing Area, an employee was using the corrosive chemical, bleach, the employer did not provide an eye wash station for the quick drenching or flushing of the eyes within the work area, for immediate emergency use.      b.  On or about July 1, 2013, at the Dirty Laundry Washing Area an employee replacing a 50-gallon container of corrosive chemical, AdvaCare Sanitizer, did not have an eye wash station for the quick drenching or flushing of the eyes within the work area, for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1000
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 F05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Abate by
Oct 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9953

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein:    a.    On or about July 1, 2013, the employer did not ensure that a 2.5-gallon of secondary spray container containing ECOLAB Neutral Disinfectant Cleaner in the Dirty Laundry Area was labeled to reflect its contents.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 F05 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Abate by
Oct 9, 2013
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings:    a.    On or about July 1, 2013, the employer did not ensure that a 2.5-gallon of secondary spray container containing ECOLAB Neutral Disinfectant Cleaner in the Dirty Laundry Area was posted with its hazard warnings.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $867 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  a.  On or about July 1, 2013, in the shop, employees used the compressed air at a pressure approximately 86 p.s.i. in the process of cleaning linen dust on machines and the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $867

1910.305 G01 IV A

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2013
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,247 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:     a.         On or about July 1, 2013, above the table, next to a small folding machine in the shop, an extension cord had been plugged into an electrical outlet on the floor and run up above the table was being used as a substitute for permanent wiring to energize the small folding machine, a fan and a small hand tool.        b.         On or about July 1, 2013, next to the table, close to the North East side of Exit door in the shop, an extension cord had been plugged into an electrical outlet above the machine, and ran down to the floor, where it was used as a substitute for permanent wiring to energize a small press machine.       c.         On or about July 1, 2013, on the Blanket Machine, an extension cord, which had been plugged into an electrical outlet above and connected to a fan, was used as a substitute for permanent wiring to energize the fan.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1247
  • · Z (S) $1700

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 339159220.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.